2025· Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data Science, Advanced Algorithms, and Intelligent Computing· pp. 291-301· 0 citations· 11 references
TL;DR
A multidimensional, standardized comparison of three generative models: Generative Adversarial Networks, Variational Autoencoders and Diffusion Models is conducted, based on extensive literature review, combining theoretical analysis and experiments to provide a scientific basis for model selection and support decision optimization in practical applications.
Abstract
: The core task of image generation models is to generate visual content that meets specific requirements based on given inputs. The wide application of artificial intelligence has accelerated the development of generative technologies, and image generation has had a significant impact across various fields in real-world scenarios. However, with many generative models available, selecting the appropriate one becomes a key issue. Current research mostly focuses on optimizing single models and lacks a comprehensive, systematic comparative analysis of multiple models. To address this, this paper conducts a multidimensional, standardized comparison of three generative models: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) and Diffusion Models, based on extensive literature review, combining theoretical analysis and experiments. The aim is to provide a scientific basis for model selection and support decision optimization in practical applications. Experimental results show that diffusion models produce better image quality but require higher hardware specifications. GANs and VAEs generate images of moderate quality with lower hardware requirements.
The proposed fusion model, combining GAN warm-up with DDIM refinement, reduces the number of sampling steps while achieving a KID of 672.17±65.15, offering a trade-off between generation quality and inference efficiency.
Zhe-Ping Ding· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
This paper summarizes the mainstream optimization research directions, such as lightweight, multi architecture integration, and multi condition controllable generation, such as lightweight, multi architecture integration, and multi condition controllable generation.
Zhi-Li Zheng· Applied and Computational En...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that mutual information regularization contributes to improved training stability, controllable generation, and more interpretable latent representations in GAN-based image generation.
A structured analytical perspective on the evolution of GAN-based T2I synthesis is provided, identifies key design trade-offs, and outlines open challenges for future research.
Shreedatta S. Sawant, S. Kaliraj, S. Raghavendra et al.· Discover Artificial Intellig...· 0 citations
Transformers are great for tasks that involve sequential and text-based information while VAEs are stable and interpretable representations, and generative AI has a considerable opportunity to make finance personalized services, automation, and decision-making much more effective.
M. Sakthivanitha· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
This paper systematically sorts out two representative controllable generation methods: the explicit structural constraint method based on additional conditions and the implicit semantic guidance method based on visual examples, which realizes precise control of image spatial layout and geometric structure.
Bing-Yi Zhao· ITM Web of Conferences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.