Aug 2026· Journal of Intelligent Decision Making and Information Science· 0 citations· 15 references
TL;DR
The proposed methodology enhances the existing methodology with a Privacy-Aware Legal Hold Intelligence algorithm that consists of concepts from transformer-based semantic classification, named-entity recognition, risk-aware policy reasoning, federated learning, and differential privacy.
Abstract
Identifying, preserving and governing electronically stored information (ESI) is a huge challenge for enterprise organizations in terms of legal-hold requirements, privacy regulations and data retention requirements. Compliance mechanisms currently in place are mostly based on manual review and pre-defined rules which delay preservation, lack consistency in legal relevance assessment, cause privacy exposure and raise overhead to the operations. The purpose of this research is to create an AI-based privacy preserving approach to automated legal hold, intelligent data preservation and enterprise compliance management. The proposed methodology enhances the existing methodology with a Privacy-Aware Legal Hold Intelligence (PALHI) algorithm that consists of concepts from transformer-based semantic classification, named-entity recognition, risk-aware policy reasoning, federated learning, and differential privacy. PALHI can be used to identify records that are relevant to litigation, to flag sensitive data, to prioritize records for preservation and to ensure the policy matches the context of the data. Experimental results show that performance, measured by the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and legal-hold detection rate, on a benchmark enterprise email and document corpus is 92.40%, 91.86%, 91.32%, 91.59% and 93.18%, respectively, with only 6.42% of false preservation decisions. The accuracy loss due to differential privacy (DP) at the level of ε=1.0 is only 2.16%. The novelty of the framework is that it is able to fuse together the concepts of relevance detection, distributed privacy preservation, and automated compliance reasoning at the same time, and do so in an intelligent manner. It provides an auditable, scalable way that decreases the compliance effort needed to do it manually and increases the reliability of preservation, confidentiality and responsiveness to regulatory requests.
The analysis suggests that governance frameworks succeed when privacy-preserving technologies are embedded into system architecture from the outset rather than added afterward, when compliance obligations are translated into measurable technical requirements, and when trust is treated as an emergent property of verifia...
The rapid advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created increasing dependence on large-scale datasets, while simultaneously generating significant legal challenges related to privacy protection, data governance, and individual rights. This study examines whether synthetic data and privacy protection mechanism...
Istiarsyah Istiarsyah, Tina Isnaeni, Rival Pahrijal· West Science Information Sys...· 0 citations
This study analyzes the cascading risk mechanisms across the data lifecycle in core AI investigative systems like facial recognition and predictive policing and proposes an integrated governance framework based on ‘Security by Design’ principles, combining technical defenses with policy controls.
Sejin Oh, Hea Joung Yoo· Forum of Public Safety and C...· 0 citations
This paper presents a reference architecture and core protocol rules for digital-value-exchange systems that preserve meaningful user privacy while enabling strong auditability, and concludes that the proposed model can successfully interface with existing payment systems, making it possible to integrate non-custodial,...
Santiago De Simone, Geoffrey Goodell, G. Samakovitis· 0 citations
Scientific artificial intelligence (AI), spanning foundation models (FMs) to federated data-analysis pipelines, is becoming shared infrastructure across national laboratories, universities, hospitals, and industrial partners. This collaboration creates privacy risks whose natural unit is often an institution's particip...
O. Kotevska, Sumit Kumar Jha, A. Bellet et al.· 1 citation
This paper argues that federated learning should be evaluated as a privacy-enhancing framework rather than as a complete privacy guarantee, and proposes a comparat ive framework that asks what federated learning protects, what it still exposes, and which auxiliary mechanisms are needed in different application settings...