Skip to content

Corporate Governance of AI-Driven Post-Merger Decision-Making: A Framework for Board Oversight and Executive Accountability

Sep 2026 · Journal of Business Practice and Academic Research · 0 citations

TL;DR

The Dual-Governance Framework for AIDriven Post-Merger Decision-Making (DGF-PMD) is proposed, explaining how AI-supported decision intelligence can be governed while preserving human responsibility and organizational control.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being integrated into organizational decision-making and is playing a growing role in mergers and acquisitions, particularly during post-merger integration activities. While AI can enhance decision quality through advanced analytics, predictive capabilities, and data-driven insights, its expanding influence in strategic decision processes raises critical governance concerns related to accountability, transparency, explainability, oversight, and responsibility. Existing research has examined AI governance, corporate governance, and post-merger integration largely as separate domains, resulting in limited understanding of how governance mechanisms should operate when AI influences post-merger decisions. This study addresses this gap by proposing the Dual-Governance Framework for AIDriven Post-Merger Decision-Making (DGF-PMD). The framework integrates Board Oversight and Executive Accountability within a unified governance architecture supported by transparency, explainability, auditability, human oversight, and ethical and ESG alignment. The proposed framework explains how AI-supported decision intelligence can be governed while preserving human responsibility and organizational control. Furthermore, the study develops governance maturity levels and theoretically derived propositions linking governance mechanisms to postmerger outcomes. The framework contributes to AI governance, corporate governance, and M&A literature by providing an integrated foundation for responsible AI-enabled post-merger decisionmaking and future empirical investigation.

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Accountability and Stakeholder Trust in the Era of AI Governance: A Comparative Study of AI-Assisted and Traditional Governance Systems

Overall, AI-assisted governance offers substantial potential to strengthen accountability and stakeholder trust when supported by robust ethical safeguards, transparency measures, and clearly defined responsibility structures.

M. Mar, Ing. Nikolai Fabian Sebastián Yucra Añazco, Delia Nieves Coaquira Pari · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Board Oversight Mechanisms in Financial Distress Decision-Making: A PRISMA-Based Systematic Review

Corporate governance plays a critical role in shaping organizational responses to financial distress, yet prior research has largely emphasized distress prediction rather than examining how boards actually exercise oversight during crisis decision-making. This study aims to clarify how board oversight mechanisms are co...

A. Popescu, Elena Ionescu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Transforming Corporate Administration through Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Strategic Decision-Making, Operational Efficiency, Ethical Governance, and Managerial Accountability

A strong positive relationship was found between the use of AI and the four dimensions of corporate administration that were investigated, thereby suggesting that the proposed integrated framework could serve as a basis for developing a theory and organizational practice for the future.

Tulika Dutta Roy · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Governing at a distance: The EU AI act and GDPR as twin pillars of digital law and corporate governance

The rapid global deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) has created governance challenges relating to accountability, privacy, corporate oversight, and regulatory compliance. While the European Union (EU) Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) are often analysed separ...

Maria de Lourdes Haynes, Akram Al Matarneh · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Developing and Validating Cognitive Governance Systems (CGS) Theory: A Human–AI Co-Governance Framework for Democratic Decision-Making

This study proposes Cognitive Governance Systems (CGS) Theory as an original explanatory framework of the interaction between human intelligence and machine intelligence in a co-decision making context of democratic government.

K. Kunwar · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.