Skip to content
Open access

Internal Governance, Voluntary Climate Commitments and Regulatory Quality as Drivers of Corporate Climate Risk Management: Evidence from a 43-Country Panel of Carbon-Intensive Firms

Aug 2026 · Sustainability · 0 citations · 46 references

Abstract

Carbon-intensive firms face growing pressure to develop strong corporate climate risk management (CCRM), yet its firm-level and country-level antecedents remain unevenly understood. Drawing on stakeholder and institutional theory, this study examines three potential antecedents of CCRM: sustainability governance, voluntary climate-membership commitments, and regulatory quality. The data cover 1295 firm-year observations across 43 countries over 2018–2022. Ordered logistic regressions are estimated with lagged independent variables, supplemented by ordered probit, two-step system GMM, sample-selection corrections (Heckman two-step and inverse probability weighting), and sub-sample robustness checks. In the main specification, sustainability governance and regulatory quality are both positively and significantly associated with CCRM; climate membership exhibits a sector-conditional association concentrated in energy and basic materials. Sub-sample analyses reveal that internal governance is the stronger correlate among non-state-owned firms, while among state-owned firms (a sub-sample heavily concentrated in Chinese SOEs), regulatory quality is the stronger correlate. The latter is framed as suggestive of context-conditional institutional substitution rather than as a universal feature of state ownership, consistent with comparative-institutional arguments that strong country-level institutions and firm-level governance can act as functional substitutes. CCRM is highly persistent, suggesting that climate risk management is best understood as a path-dependent organizational capability built incrementally over time. Firms seeking to strengthen CCRM should prioritize establishing a board-level sustainability committee with a clear climate mandate; regulators should treat regulatory-quality reform as complementary to direct climate mandates.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.