Skip to content
Open access

Learning Finnish inflectional classes: experiments with the discriminative lexicon model

Sep 2026 · Morphology · Vol 36 · 0 citations · 155 references

Abstract

This study shows that the Discriminative Lexicon Model (DLM) can learn Finnish nominal inflection from paired form and meaning embeddings, without being given access to stems, exponents, inflectional features, and information about inflectional class. It also shows that the model is productive. It generalizes to novel words, and does so with greater precision for more productive inflectional classes. This does not imply that productivity reduces simply to the absence of irregularity. Rather, generalization is made possible thanks to substantial isomorphies that exist between the space of form embeddings and the space of meaning embeddings. Usage-based DLM models that take token frequency into account have lower type accuracy: practice makes perfect, but with less practice, learning becomes increasingly problematic. Nevertheless, token-based DLMs perform well token-wise; they generalize to novel words, and reflect the differences in productivity of inflectional classes even better than type-based models. It is also shown that DLM comprehension models with form embeddings based on 4-grams outperform models with form embeddings based on 3-grams. This is due to 4-grams better covering the partial combinatorics of exponents and corresponding to more informative regions in the semantic embedding space.

Read PDF

Similar papers

#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Augustinian BabyLM: What Ostensive Definition Can and Cannot Teach a Small Language Model

A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever'banana'means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine's picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens rece...

Lisa Bylinina · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

BLiMPPI: Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Polarity Items

Negative polarity items (NPIs), such as"anymore"and"ever", are grammatical only in select environments, predominantly in the context of negation. Because their grammaticality depends on both syntax and semantics, they have a rich, multilingual literature in theoretical linguistics, yet work on NPIs in language models i...

Arzu Burcu Güven, Anna Rogers, Leonie Weissweiler et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings Revisited: Large Language Models Display Syntactic Bootstrapping

The results show that models’ verb representations degrade more when the authors perturb word order, which removes syntactic information, than when they perturb co-occurrence among content words, which removes semantic information.

Xiao-Meng Zhu, R. Thomas McCoy, Robert Frank · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Typological Alignment of Stack-Based Language Models on Mildly Context-Sensitive Artificial Languages

Some properties of languages, e.g., subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, are more prevalent than others among the thousands of attested natural languages (NLs). Such typological commonality is often attributed to learning biases. Computational simulations, recently with language models (LMs), have facilitated the expl...

Nadine El-Naggar, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Ted Briscoe · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.