This study shows that the Discriminative Lexicon Model (DLM) can learn Finnish nominal inflection from paired form and meaning embeddings, without being given access to stems, exponents, inflectional features, and information about inflectional class. It also shows that the model is productive. It generalizes to novel words, and does so with greater precision for more productive inflectional classes. This does not imply that productivity reduces simply to the absence of irregularity. Rather, generalization is made possible thanks to substantial isomorphies that exist between the space of form embeddings and the space of meaning embeddings. Usage-based DLM models that take token frequency into account have lower type accuracy: practice makes perfect, but with less practice, learning becomes increasingly problematic. Nevertheless, token-based DLMs perform well token-wise; they generalize to novel words, and reflect the differences in productivity of inflectional classes even better than type-based models. It is also shown that DLM comprehension models with form embeddings based on 4-grams outperform models with form embeddings based on 3-grams. This is due to 4-grams better covering the partial combinatorics of exponents and corresponding to more informative regions in the semantic embedding space.
A language model normally begins training with random word embeddings: whatever'banana'means must be learned from training corpora. I implement St. Augustine's picture of word learning, meaning by ostension, for a small masked language model (DeBERTa) trained on 10M words: before training, visually grounded tokens rece...
Negative polarity items (NPIs), such as"anymore"and"ever", are grammatical only in select environments, predominantly in the context of negation. Because their grammaticality depends on both syntax and semantics, they have a rich, multilingual literature in theoretical linguistics, yet work on NPIs in language models i...
Arzu Burcu Güven, Anna Rogers, Leonie Weissweiler et al.· 0 citations
The results show that models’ verb representations degrade more when the authors perturb word order, which removes syntactic information, than when they perturb co-occurrence among content words, which removes semantic information.
Xiao-Meng Zhu, R. Thomas McCoy, Robert Frank· Open Mind· 0 citations
Some properties of languages, e.g., subject-object-verb (SOV) word order, are more prevalent than others among the thousands of attested natural languages (NLs). Such typological commonality is often attributed to learning biases. Computational simulations, recently with language models (LMs), have facilitated the expl...