Skip to content
Conference Open access

Examination of Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning

2025 · Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Data Science, Advanced Algorithms, and Intelligent Computing · 0 citations · 10 references

TL;DR

In the future, it is essential to establish a standardized validation framework, develop interpretable algorithms, integrate wearable non-invasive markers, and implement Bayesian racial modeling to promote early screening and personalized intervention, thereby revolutionizing the clinical prevention paradigm.

Abstract

: Diabetes has become a severe challenge to global public health: in 2023, there are 537 million cases worldwide (expected to rise to 783 million by 2045), with annual medical expenses exceeding $727 billion. Furthermore, 30% to 50% of patients are undiagnosed and asymptomatic, highlighting the urgent need for precise predictive models. The advantages of machine learning are significant: for instance, the random forest model combining HbA1c and FLI achieved an AUC of 0.874, while the cross-population model from the THIN database achieved an AUC ranging from 0.907 to 0.925. The integration of lifestyle data through CATBoost revealed a U-shaped risk association with sleep duration, and the accuracy of the multi-source hybrid model exceeded 98%, confirming the value of multimodal integration. However, current research faces challenges including data heterogeneity, insufficient external validation, poor interpretability of deep learning, and difficulties in multimodal integration. In the future, it is essential to establish a standardized validation framework, develop interpretable algorithms, integrate wearable non-invasive markers, and implement Bayesian racial modeling to promote early screening and personalized intervention, thereby revolutionizing the clinical prevention paradigm.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning Model: A comparative Approach

Six supervised learning models were developed and compared for diabetes prediction using a dataset and compared for diabetes prediction using a 100k patients records with eight clinical features including gender, age, hypertension, smoking history, heart disease, BMI, HbA1c level, and blood glucose level.

Akshay Bhardwaj, Rajesh Chauhan, Devansh Khajuria · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A comparative and interpretable machine learning framework for reliable diabetes risk prediction.

It is indicated that a rigorously conducted methodology and interpretability in machine learning development are crucial in creating machine learning solutions in healthcare decision support, which is the pathway to real applications in diabetes risk assessment.

T. Khan, M. Saeed, Majid Hussain et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

A Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Diabetes Risk Prediction

Evaluated machine learning algorithms for predicting diabetes risk from routinely available clinical and lifestyle variables confirm that ensemble tree-based methods, particularly Random Forest, provide a reliable, interpretable, and deployable basis for diabetes risk screening, especially in resource-constrained setti...

T. Olayinka · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Machine Learning for Diabetes Screening: Insights from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and Pima Indians Diabetes Databases

A simple logistic regression – with excellent recall and competitive AUC – appears preferable for population screening, where transparency, robustness to reporting noise, and ease of implementation are paramount.

Shaked Shechter, N. Shomron · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

A Comparative Machine Learning Framework for Early Diabetes Risk Prediction

This study investigated the application of machine learning techniques and exploratory data analysis to forecast early-onset of diabetes using the PIMA Indian dataset, finding promising results.

Abdulrahman Nasiru Sada, Eli. A. Jiya, Yahaya Muhammad Umar et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

An Interpretable XGBoost Model for Diabetes Prediction: Nested Cross-Validation, Calibration, and SHAP Analysis

Under a leakage-controlled, unbiased evaluation, XGBoost provided moderate but trustworthy discrimination together with well-calibrated probabilities for diabetes prediction, while SHAP confirmed clinically plausible predictors.

Z. Kucukakcali, I. Cicek · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.