Jul 2026· Journal of Advanced Nursing· 0 citations· 44 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A theoretically grounded synthesis of research gaps and implementation priorities for AI development aligned with nursing clinical judgement is provided, identifying research gaps and implementation priorities for AI development aligned with nursing clinical judgement.
Abstract
Aim
To map and analyse how artificial intelligence technologies interact with and support clinical judgement processes in nursing across practice and educational contexts.
Design
Scoping review.
Methods
JBI methodology for scoping reviews.
DATA SOURCES
An electronic search was conducted on 1 July 2025 across MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore to identify studies published since January 2015. Additional sources of grey literature included ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, preprint servers (medRxiv and arXiv), and websites of relevant organisations.
Results
Eleven studies were included. Mapped against Tanner's Clinical Judgement Model, AI applications predominantly supported early cognitive phases (noticing and interpreting) through predictive models and decision support systems, while responding and reflecting phases received minimal attention.
Conclusion
Current AI research in nursing concentrates on computational pattern recognition, with the reflective processes central to expertise development remaining largely unexamined. Future research should examine how AI influences nurses' cognitive and interpretative processes across all phases of clinical judgement, with primary studies in nursing education representing a particularly underdeveloped priority.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE
The integration of artificial intelligence into nursing practice should be guided by a clear understanding of how these technologies support clinical judgement. Artificial intelligence-enabled tools must be rigorously developed, implemented, and evaluated to enhance nurses' reasoning processes while safeguarding patient safety, professional autonomy, and quality of care.
IMPACT
Research on artificial intelligence in nursing rarely employs theoretical frameworks of clinical judgement, limiting understanding of how these technologies interact with cognitive processes central to professional expertise. This review provides a theoretically grounded synthesis, identifying research gaps and implementation priorities for AI development aligned with nursing clinical judgement.
REPORTING
Method
PRISMA-ScR.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
This study did not include patient or public involvement in its design, conduct or reporting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Protocol registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io; DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/UH7RA), and subsequently published in a peer-reviewed journal, DOI: https://doi.org/10.62741/ahrj.v2i4.73.
This scoping review will map the scope and nature of the available evidence on the use of artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support systems (AI-CDSSs) for undergraduate nursing students to support clinical reasoning, diagnostic reasoning, prioritization, or the nursing process.
Francesco Scerbo, G. Caggianelli, Simone Ciucciarelli et al.· JBI Evidence Synthesis· 0 citations
AI currently augments rather than transforms OSCE assessment, performing best in structured, observable tasks and least well in relational, situated, and culturally mediated competencies.
Sergio Andrés León-Ariza, María Camila Orobio-Pinzón, Héctor Miguel Ibáñez-Gutiérrez et al.· Medical Teacher· 0 citations
Nursing academics appear to adopt AI selectively, prioritising preservation of core professional values while embracing applications perceived to enhance, rather than replace, educational practice, providing evidence for nursing education programs globally regarding faculty development, institutional policy frameworks,...
Natasha Hawkins, Anthea Fagan, Yumiko Coffey et al.· Journal of Advanced Nursing· 0 citations
Nurse-facing AI-CDSS may strengthen acute and critical care nursing by improving surveillance, escalation and protocol delivery for patients at risk of deterioration, evidence is promising but limited by small study numbers, heterogeneous interventions and sparse nurse-reported outcomes.
W. Almagharbeh, S. Alkubati, A. A. Alasmari et al.· Nursing Critical Care· 0 citations
This study provides a comprehensive overview of the intellectual landscape of research on healthcare professionals' perceptions of AI through bibliometric analysis, revealing a shift toward human-centered research emphasizing healthcare professionals' competencies, acceptance, and concerns regarding AI.
Future research should prioritize validated, multilingual, and patient-centered evaluation tools that integrate conventional information-quality attributes with clinically relevant dimensions such as safety, actionability, personalization, transparency, empathy, and response efficiency.
Jingwen Song, Norafisyah Makhdzir, Zarina Haron et al.· Frontiers in Public Health· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.