It is argued that data governance is becoming inseparable from AI governance, digital public infrastructure, economic strategy, democratic resilience, and geopolitical competition, and an agenda for anticipatory data governance capable of adapting before dependencies, risks, and missed opportunities become locked in is outlined.
Abstract
This paper reports findings from a structured participatory foresight study comprising two expert forecasting studios convened by The GovLab between 2025 and 2026. The studios brought together nineteen senior practitioners spanning official statistics, digital and trade policy, open science, AI governance, geospatial systems, and public-sector innovation across multiple jurisdictions. Applying a qualitative signal-scanning methodology grounded in the horizon-scanning and anticipatory-governance traditions, we elicited, clustered, and thematically synthesized emerging developments in data access, governance,and reuse, and stress-tested them against practitioner experience. We identify seven convergent signals: (1) the open-data paradigm is under strain; (2) data ecosystems are becoming machine-centric and AI-mediated; (3) inference is reshaping the foundations of data governance;(4) data infrastructure is becoming harder to sustain; (5) governance is fragmenting across institutions and jurisdictions; (6) sovereignty and security are driving a turn toward strategic control; and (7) data-sharing models require stronger incentives and benefit-sharing mechanisms. We further map the reinforcing feedback loops that couple these signals, showing how interventions in one domain propagate risks and opportunities across the wider ecosystem. We argue that data governance is becoming inseparable from AI governance, digital public infrastructure, economic strategy, democratic resilience, and geopolitical competition, and we outline an agenda for anticipatory data governance capable of adapting before dependencies, risks, and missed opportunities become locked in. The contribution is diagnostic rather than predictive: the signals offer an evidence-informed framework for reasoning about structural shifts already underway, not a forecast of specific technological outcomes.
A conceptual crosswalk is proposed that maps controls across domains onto shared AI lifecycle stages, exposing redundancy and gaps and set out a research agenda for integrated governance that treats legal, financial, and data controls as a single accountable system rather than three parallel ones.
Ashore-Onisemo Funmilayo· International Journal of Eco...· 0 citations
Capital projects in the energy sector continue to experience systemic cost overruns and schedule delays. While AI-driven predictive analytics promise improved foresight, their effectiveness is often limited by fragmented data landscapes, inconsistent reporting practices, and weak governance. This paper introduces a d...
Fuad Shalan, Sarafudheen M. Tharayil, Rawabi Aldossary et al.· GOTECH· 0 citations
This study addresses the gap between abstract ethical principles and practical, distributed demands of modern AI governance through a PRISMA 2020 guided systematic review of 78 peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2024, aiming to synthesise a cohesive architecture for modern AI governance.
A. Faza, Ilyana Agri Lestari· Applied Cybersecurity &...· 0 citations
The capacity of nations to collect, govern, analyse and act upon data has become a defining
determinant of public value, competitiveness and resilience. This paper synthesises the state of the
art in national analytics capacity, the interlocking set of infrastructures, human capital,
institutional and governance arr...
Uchechi Mary-Linda Unamma· INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOC...· 0 citations
Claims of AI sovereignty are increasingly invoked but operational control remains uneven. Claims to control are made through national models, sovereign clouds, data localization mandates, and procurement rules; however, whether such claims translate into demonstrable control over how AI systems are run, inspected, and...
R. Raman, Prema Nedungadi· Applied Informatics· 0 citations
The intention is to advance a term that moves beyond the limits of data sovereignty to explain how governance over data-driven systems is distributed and contested, and suggests pragmatic pathways for more effective governance.
Jaime Bernal· Data & Policy· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.