Sep 2026· Software, Practice & Experience· 0 citations· 22 references
TL;DR
The proposed FMSysML, a SysML‐based profile that captures the structural and behavioral semantics of flight modes and enforces static semantic consistency rules, enables scalable, traceable, and practical formal verification of safety‐critical flight mode transitions.
Abstract
Flight mode transitions in automatic flight systems (AFS) is critical for linking pilot commands, automatic control logic, and aircraft behavior. Ensuring correctness is challenging due to complex interactions among modes and ambiguities in natural‐language requirements. This study aims to provide a systematic framework for modeling and formally verifying flight mode transition requirements.
We propose FMSysML, a SysML‐based profile that captures the structural and behavioral semantics of flight modes and enforces static semantic consistency rules. An automated transformation pipeline converts FMSysML models into NuXMV for formal verification. Safety properties are derived in three categories: global mode transition logic based on the flight mode transition matrix, domain constraints extracted from modes, modules, and events, and operational properties anchored to attribute semantics.
A case study on industrial‐scale AFS requirements demonstrates that the framework can automatically construct analyzable formal models and generate over 1100 properties, including more than 900 derived from the flight mode transition matrix. Due to state‐space explosion, a representative subset of 187 properties was verified using NuXMV. Verification successfully identified six latent requirement or modeling defects, highlighting issues such as under‐specified guard conditions.
The proposed framework enables scalable, traceable, and practical formal verification of safety‐critical flight mode transitions, bridging the gap between informal requirements and formal analysis in complex avionics systems.
Safety engineering and design modeling in the development of Cyber-physical Systems (CPS) involves fragmented tools, languages, and representations. Furthermore, both modeling activities are performed at different stages of the CPS development life cycle. This fragmentation necessitates manual synchronization and consi...
Muhammad Asim Minhas, Erik Burger, Ralf Reussner· Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE...· 0 citations
This paper presents a Model-Based Systems Engineering (MBSE) design framework for the SysML-driven development of autonomous UAVs that supports requirement allocation, interface definition, subsystem responsibility assignment, and verification planning before simulation or physical deployment.
Deekshitha Angadi, Naveena Budda, Vikas Agarwal et al.· 0 citations
A four-layer framework that supports traceable, bidirectional interaction between a system’s architecture and its physical implementation and contributes to MBSE-driven digital twin research by providing a structured process for integrating architecture, translation, execution, monitoring, and synchronization in a trac...
M. Islam, Aditya Akundi, Sergio A. Luna Fong· Systems· 0 citations
Formal methods, including model checking, are rapidly gaining importance, especially in safety-critical domains like aerospace and automotive. Consequently, the systems to be verified are growing more complex and are described in diverse design languages, often expressive and ambiguous. However, model checkers oper...
Zsófia Ádám, Zoltán Micskei· Journal of Software and Syst...· 0 citations
Constraint-DEVS is introduced, a method for creating bounded Parallel DEVS models that lend themselves, in addition to simulation, to model checking and the DEVS-Suite framework's hybrid model-checking and simulation engine is extended.
In many industrial systems, control-related information is often opaque, undermining the ability to formally ensure safety, correctness, and performance. Representing such systems as Discrete Event Systems (DES) models enables rigorous analysis, synthesis, and correct-by-construction control, but modeling is typically...
Jhonnatan R. Semler, Rosaine F. Semler, M. Wehrmeister et al.· IEEE Transactions on Automat...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.