2026· Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso· 0 citations
TL;DR
The ethical limits of AI, particularly generative AI, such as ChatGPT, are discussed, questioning its impact on human processes of interaction and meaning-making, and the extent to which AI can engage in authentic dialogue is assessed.
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article, we aim to discuss, based on Bakhtinian dialogic theory, the ethical limits of AI, particularly generative AI, such as ChatGPT, questioning its impact on human processes of interaction and meaning-making. To this end, we present a historical overview of the origins of AI as a process embedded in transformations in social relations. Next, grounded in Bakhtinian theoretical principles of dialogue, responsiveness, and ideology, we assess the extent to which AI can engage in authentic dialogue. With our discussion, we highlight, on the one hand, that in Bakhtinian terms, the discursive horizon of AI is limited to the corpus with which it was trained, blocking the authentic responsive dialogic nature of this interaction. On the other hand, we emphasize that this limitation - determined by AI creators - reproduces cultural and ideological patterns, potentially silencing various social voices. Finally, we stress the need to consider that AIs respond to the context of neoliberal transformations in production and consumption relations, characterized by the overlap between media, market, and the commodification of information. In light of this, it is ultimately the human being who must ethically assume responsibility for decision-making in the use and creation of technologies.
By positioning generative AI as a more-than-human conversational participant, the study invites qualitative researchers to think with non-human actors in the production of knowledge, extending post-qualitative approaches to digitally mediated research environments.
Wedsha Appadoo-Ramsamy· Qualitative Research Journal· 0 citations
A philosophical-theological framework for evaluating “synthetic dialogue”, understood as machine-generated conversational interaction designed to shape beliefs, trust, and social bonds and a set of practical recommendations for researchers, platform designers, and religious communities seeking resilience against cognit...
It is predicted that for these topics to be explored accurately, it is necessary to decentralize the human and adopt a hybrid view of humans, society, and language.
Renan Monezi Lemes· Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estu...· 0 citations
Conversation Analysis is adopted as a methodological framework to examine recorded speaking practice sessions between English as a Second or Foreign Language (ESL/EFL) learners and an AI tutoring system and indicates that current AI tutoring systems, despite advanced language models, have not yet achieved interactional...
Wenting Li· Advances in Humanities Resea...· 0 citations
This workshop proposes a paradigm shift toward designing context-specific CUIs that actively support communicative success through pragmatic cues, and brings together perspectives from HCI and social sciences to explore how users appropriate conversational AI across domains.
Laura Spillner, Johanna Rockstroh, Paul Goerke et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Comparing AI with animals, aliens, and deities is highlighted, highlighting both the promise and the limits of extending the authors' concepts of mind and meaning beyond the human case.
Unknown authors· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.