Aug 2026· Journal of Advances in Dental Practice and Research· 0 citations· 13 references
TL;DR
Immediate placement of extra-wide diameter implants in posterior molar sites demonstrated high survival rates and maintenance of crestal bone levels above the implant platform, suggesting this approach is a predictable treatment option.
Abstract
To evaluate crestal bone level changes and survival of immediately placed extra-wide diameter implants in posterior molar sites.
This prospective clinical study included 30 patients requiring molar extraction and implant placement, with 28 patients completing follow-up. A total of 29 implants were placed immediately following atraumatic extraction and positioned subcrestally. Crestal bone levels were measured radiographically at placement and at a minimum of 1-year post-restoration using calibrated ImageJ analysis.
The mean crestal bone level was 1.28 mm at placement and 0.46 mm at follow-up, with a mean change of 0.82 mm (95% confidence intervals: 0.34–1.29 mm). This difference was statistically significant (
p
= 0.001). Despite this change, crestal bone levels remained coronal to the implant platform at follow-up. One implant failure occurred, resulting in a survival rate of 96.5%.
Immediate placement of extra-wide diameter implants in posterior molar sites demonstrated high survival rates and maintenance of crestal bone levels above the implant platform, suggesting this approach is a predictable treatment option.
Immediate implants placed 6 mm below the mid-buccal gingival level showed significantly less short-term marginal bone loss than immediate implants placed 4 mm below the gingiva after a period of 1 year.
Jonas Alkimavicius, Manish Rathi, Ula Linkeviciute et al.· Journal of Prosthodontics· 0 citations
The clinical outcome supports current evidence indicating that osseodensification may enhance initial stability and predictability of immediate implants placed in posterior mandibular regions.
Márcio de Carvalho Formiga, Jucielly Santos Lesnik de Souza, Gustavo dos Santos Coura et al.· Reports· 0 citations
Ceramic implants may represent a viable metal-free treatment option for appropriately selected patients, particularly in esthetically demanding situations, when careful case selection, system-specific training, and adherence to surgical and restorative protocols are applied.
M. Monzavi, Medis Masnavi, Ayman Zraiqat et al.· Journal of Esthetic and Rest...· 0 citations
OBJECTIVES
This randomized clinical study aimed to assess implant placement accuracy and radiographic outcomes of computer-guided versus freehand ridge split and expansion with simultaneously inserted implants in patients with horizontally deficient maxillary anterior ridges over a 2-year follow-up period.
METHODS
Tw...
Asmaa Allam, Nour Hatata, Walid S. Salem et al.· E -journal of dentistry· 0 citations
T-PRF-treated sites showed a trend towards increased early implant stability and decreased crestal bone loss compared to control sites, however, conclusive evidence cannot be drawn about the clinical superiority of T-PRF because of the small sample size and short follow-up period.
Anuraga Tejaswi Thotimpuri, M. Pasupuleti, G. Penmetsa et al.· Journal of Advanced Periodon...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.