Aug 2026· International journal of computer information systems and industrial management applications· Vol 18, pp. 1026-1046· 0 citations
TL;DR
The results showed that Random Forest did the best out of all the models, and this, along with the best performance as a whole, led to the conclusion that ensemble methods are a reliable way to classify different levels of mental health seriousness.
Abstract
The study examines ordinary DASS-21 surveys and various models of machine and deep learning to identify the levels of anxiety, depression, and stress. Mental health data class imbalance greatly affects the upper class intensity of model training time. To optimize model performance, the dataset was balanced using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). We assessed cross model performance by tuning accuracy, precision, recall, and f1 score and analyzing the various techniques employed. The enactment of the models was rated based on the predominance of upper intensity class response. Of the several models, the Random Forest algorithms surpassed the others/competitors across all levels of intensity. The model was able to identify all levels of intensity approximately 98.43% of the time. The apparent intra-class postulation of Random Forest where the average accuracy, recall, and F1-scores were high postulates perfect and equal intra-class distribution. The results showed that Random Forest did the best out of all the models, and this, along with the best performance as a whole, led to the conclusion that ensemble methods are a reliable way to classify different levels of mental health seriousness. Random Forest's success shows that it could be used to automatically find mental health problems in study and therapy settings. The data also show that automatic systems can help decision support systems find high-risk individuals early on and give mental health systems the tools they need to help people in the right way at the right time.
This study proposes a multiclass predictive framework for academic stress and mental health risk classification among students using a Kaggle dataset containing 25,000 records, and indicates that ensemble and deep learning approaches can effectively support multiclass mental health risk classification.
Shoaib Ahmad, A. Imran, Tahoona Kshif et al.· ICCK Journal of Software Eng...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that machine learning algorithms can serve as effective tools for classifying Facebook text into varying levels of depression severity, but challenges such as class imbalance, limited data availability, and discrepancies between self-assessment results and online behavior indicate that further resear...
Keito R. Yoneyama· Chulalongkorn Medical Journa...· 0 citations
The proposed model demonstrates the potential of interpretable soft voting as a decision-support tool for mental health severity stratification in resource-constrained settings as well as the limitations of secondary self-reported data and class imbalance.
Yefta Christian, Herman Herman, Muhammad Hafis et al.· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
Stress has developed a huge issue worldwide, impacting people's mental and physical health. In this context, the need for precise and timely stress detection in healthcare, workplace settings, and customized wellness monitoring has revealed the drawbacks of traditional stress detection methods, such as subjective evalu...
DhanaLakshmi K, C. R· International Conference Com...· 0 citations
Depression, anxiety and PTSD among women are commonly associated with distinct difficulties as they have gender specific symptoms and different degrees of severity. The importance of early diagnosis and proper severity evaluation is to provide interventions and better treatment results. But conventional means of diagno...
Ashwini E, V. S. Rani, Vempati Krishna· International Conference on...· 0 citations
An explainable machine learning framework for predicting student depression risk using non-clinical demographic, academic, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors was developed and explainability analysis identified Suicidal Thoughts, Academic Pressure, and Financial Stress as the most influential predictors.
Reynalyn Cernechez, S. Hosseini, Muhammad Nadeem et al.· Bioengineering· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.