Prospective evaluation of hearing aid fitting adjusted toward one-third functional gain in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
TL;DR
Modifying DSL version 5-based hearing aid fittings by adjusting gain on HA fitting software so that measured functional gain approached a one-third gain target could provide appropriate fitting outcomes in patients with sensorineural hearing loss are evaluated.
Abstract
Objective
To prospectively evaluate whether modifying DSL version 5-based hearing aid (HA) fittings by adjusting gain on HA fitting software so that measured functional gain (FG) approached a one-third gain (1/3G) target could provide appropriate fitting outcomes in patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
Methods
Twenty-four patients (48 ears) with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss underwent initial HA fitting using the DSL version 5 prescription formula. FG was measured at 250-4000 Hz, and HA gain was adjusted on HA fitting software so that FG approached the target 1/3 G. Speech discrimination scores at 65 and 80 dB SPL were evaluated after a two-week trial period using the 67-S Japanese monosyllable word list. Based on speech discrimination test results, ears were classified as well-fitting or non-well-fitting. FG values were compared between the two groups.
Results
Twenty-one patients (42 ears) completed the study. Thirty-one ears (73%) were classified as well-fitting. Although HA gain was adjusted toward the target 1/3 G, measured FG values at 250 and 500 Hz remained lower than the target values. In well-fitting ears, low-frequency FG values were lower than the target 1/3 G, whereas FG at 2000 Hz was close to the target value. In contrast, non-well-fitting ears showed low-frequency FG values closer to the target 1/3 G, whereas FG values at 2000 and 4000 Hz remained below the target values.
Conclusions
Although HAs adjusted toward a 1/3 G target did not achieve the intended FG values, particularly at low frequencies, relatively favorable fitting outcomes were obtained in approximately three-quarters of the ears. In well-fitting ears, low-frequency FG remained below the target 1/3 G, whereas FG in the mid-frequency range around 2000 Hz was close to the target value. These findings provide a basis for future prospective studies to clarify how these FG characteristics should be applied to optimize HA adjustment.
