Sep 2026· IIARD INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANKING AND FINANCE RESEARCH· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is concluded that a coherent, fit-for-purpose federal regulatory framework is both urgently needed and achievable, and the contours of effective legislative design are outlined.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of blockchain-based digital assets has outpaced the development of
coherent legal frameworks in the United States, creating a fragmented, multi-agency regulatory
environment that simultaneously seeks to protect investors, prevent financial crime, and preserve
American competitiveness in financial innovation. This article provides a comprehensive
examination of the existing regulatory architecture governing cryptocurrencies and blockchain
technology in the U.S., analyzing the overlapping jurisdictions of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network (FinCEN), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and state-level authorities. We assess the application of
foundational legal tests particularly the Howey Test to digital token classification, trace the
evolution of enforcement actions, evaluate the landscape of pending federal legislation, and
project the trajectory of U.S. crypto regulation in a globally competitive context. The article
concludes that a coherent, fit-for-purpose federal regulatory framework is both urgently needed
and achievable, and outlines the contours of effective legislative design.
The emergence of cryptocurrencies and digital assets has significantly transformed the global financial system by introducing decentralized technologies that facilitate secure, transparent, and borderless transactions. Cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and various stablecoins, together with tokenized digital...
Research Author· Global Journal of Computing...· 0 citations
Background: Blockchain-based assets increasingly operate as investment and commercial property, yet their decentralized architecture, pseudonymous control, volatility, and cross-border transferability challenge conventional bankruptcy mechanisms.
Objective: This study examines how digital assets may be treated under in...
Yalid Yalid, Yeni Triana, Irawan Harahap et al.· Journal of Law and Social Po...· 0 citations
Blockchain-based smart contracts automate cross-border commercial performance, yet their finality does not by itself resolve questions of consent, validity, liability, applicable law, jurisdiction, evidence, remedies, and enforcement. Existing scholarship generally examines domestic contractual validity or sector-speci...
Leni Indrawati, Dhaniswara K. Harjono, Adi Nur Rohman et al.· Siber International Journal...· 0 citations
This paper aims to examine the challenges of cross-border enforcement of blockchain securities within India’s dual regulatory architecture comprising mainland securities regulation and the Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT) City regime. It seeks to identify how jurisdictional arbitrage, regulatory fragme...
Dolly Jabbal, Partheeswaran Parameswaran· Journal of Financial Regulat...· 0 citations
This paper examines whether the proliferation of cryptocurrency-facilitated fraud warrants a reclassification of the terrestrial crime of fraud into the distinct statutory offence of cyberfraud under South African law. Engaging with established fraud typologies — exit scams, Initial Coin Offering (ICO) scams, Ponzi sch...
Sagwadi Mabunda, Yassin Chande· Communications of the IIMA· 0 citations
The present research explores how blockchain technology and cryptocurrencies challenge the traditional continental civil law framework. By reassessing the legal taxonomy of digital assets, the paper argues against their strict classification as jura in personam, primarily due to the absence of a designated debtor in pe...
Marius-Gabriel Păun· Ars Aequi· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.