2026· International journal of research in social sciences and humanities· Vol 07, pp. 01-10· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is demonstrated that AI can strengthen institutional integrity through transparent, auditable, and standardized judicial administration without replacing judicial independence or human decision-making authority.
Abstract
Digital transformation in judicial systems increasingly employs Artificial Intelligence (AI) to enhance transparency, accountability, efficiency, and institutional integrity. This study examines the implementation of Smart Majelis, an AI- assisted judge assignment system integrated into Indonesia’s Case Tracking Information System (SIPP), at Military Court III-13 Madiun and identifies factors affecting its effectiveness. An empirical legal research design with a socio- legal approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, document analysis, and review of relevant regulations, and analyzed qualitatively. The findings reveal that Smart Majelis transforms judge panel assignment from a predominantly manual process into an algorithm-assisted mechanism based on judges’ qualifications, competencies, and workloads. The system enhances objectivity, transparency, accountability, and administrative efficiency while preserving human oversight through judicial review of algorithmic recommendations. Its implementation is supported by leadership commitment, technological infrastructure, information technology competence, procedural adjustments, and stakeholder acceptance. However, effectiveness remains constrained by dependence on the Supreme Court’s central server, limited AI-specific regulation, staff adaptation challenges, and maintenance funding. This study contributes to judicial digital transformation literature by demonstrating that AI can strengthen institutional integrity through transparent, auditable, and standardized judicial administration without replacing judicial independence or human decision-making authority.
Pakistan should adopt AI gradually, beginning with administrative and low-risk functions, while preserving the judge as the final constitutional decision-maker, through a doctrinal, analytical and comparative legal approach.
M. Azhar, Naeem Ullah Khan· Journal of Law & Social...· 0 citations
Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) is increasingly recognised as an important instrument of judicial modernisation and institutional reform. In India, persistent case pendency, procedural delays, linguistic diversity, voluminous judicial records, and limitations in judicial and administrative resources create significant d...
Kundena Prashanth Kumar, G. Naresh· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
Examination of AI-assisted legal research in Uganda’s Superior Courts through doctrinal, jurisprudential and normative analysis argues that precedent presents an ethical governance problem and requires governance of both the research output and the legal-information infrastructure that makes the output possible.
Purpose – This study examines the governance of artificial intelligence (AI) in Indian education by assessing whether existing constitutional, statutory, judicial, and policy frameworks adequately regulate AI-assisted educational decision-making under the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and by identifying appropri...
Anurag Yadav, Rais Ahmad· Artificial Intelligence in E...· 0 citations
The administration of justice is fundamental to the rule of law and democratic governance. In Nigeria, however, the justice delivery system continues to face persistent challenges, including excessive case backlog, prolonged delays in adjudication, inadequate judicial personnel, poor record management, limited access t...
Umar Ibrahim Wunti, Auwal Ibrahim, Usman Bappah Darazo· International Journal of Law...· 0 citations
This study investigates the fairness risks and regulatory mechanisms of AI-assisted judicial decision-making by establishing an integrated framework that combines algorithm interpretability, data governance, bias mitigation, and human–machine collaborative control.