Jul 2026· Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal· Vol 7, pp. 6-10· 0 citations· 19 references
TL;DR
Most nurses demonstrated suboptimal pain-assessment practices, despite moderate overall knowledge, and regular competency-based training and consistent availability of standardized behavioural assessment tools may improve pain assessment in non-verbal critically ill patients.
Abstract
Accurate pain assessment in non-verbal critically ill patients is essential for appropriate pain management. Nurses’ knowledge, training and access to validated behavioural pain-assessment tools may influence routine assessment practices. Objective: To assess nurses’ knowledge and practices regarding pain assessment in non-verbal critically ill patients and identify factors associated with good pain-assessment practice. Methods: A multicentre descriptive correlational cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2025 to May 2026 among 165 registered nurses working in adult critical-care units at Mayo Hospital Lahore and WAPDA Teaching Hospital Complex, Lahore. Participants were selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire comprising demographic characteristics, 20 knowledge items, 15 practice items and 10 perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics, correlation tests and multivariable binary logistic regression were applied using SPSS version 29. Results: The mean age of participants was 32.08 ± 6.45 years, and 124 (75.2%) were female. Formal pain-assessment training was reported by 69 (41.8%) nurses, while CPOT or BPS was available to 78 (47.3%). The mean knowledge score was 13.96 ± 2.53 out of 20, with 75 (45.5%) nurses demonstrating good knowledge. The mean practice score was 54.45 ± 6.83 out of 75, and only 64 (38.8%) demonstrated good practice. Knowledge and practice scores showed a moderate positive correlation (ρ=0.495, p<0.001). Knowledge score (aOR=1.41; 95% CI: 1.18–1.67), previous training (aOR=2.40; 95% CI: 1.14–5.05) and availability of CPOT/BPS (aOR=2.34; 95% CI: 1.11–4.94) independently predicted good practice. High workload, competing emergencies and unavailable assessment forms were the leading barriers. Conclusion: Most nurses demonstrated suboptimal pain-assessment practices, despite moderate overall knowledge. Regular competency-based training and consistent availability of standardized behavioural assessment tools may improve pain assessment in non-verbal critically ill patients.
BACKGROUND
Effective pain management in cognitively impaired older adults can reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms. This study examined how nurses' knowledge and attitudes towards pain assessment and management, pain management practices, self-efficacy in pain management, collaboration with physicians, and nurs...
BACKGROUND
Pain is a universal human experience and a persistent challenge for health services. Its assessment and management require evidence-based competencies to ensure safe, person-centered care. In most health systems, patients with pain are cared for by both nursing professionals and nursing assistants depending...
Adriana Patricia Bonilla Marciales, Lizeth Catherine Rodríguez Corredor, Gloria Inés Arenas Luna et al.· Pain Management Nursing· 0 citations
Neonatal pain remains inconsistently assessed, particularly in resource-limited settings. We assessed healthcare professionals’ knowledge and reported practices regarding postoperative neonatal pain assessment in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional sur...
Eriksson Landu, Joseph Nsiala, Arriel Makembi-Bunkete et al.· Frontiers in Pain Research· 0 citations
This study aimed to examine nurses’ competency for pain management and the predictive factors of educational level, work experience, working unit, nurse-physician relationship, and training on pain management on nurses’ competency for pain management. The total sample size was 203 staff nurses who had work experience r...