Skip to content
Open access

Designing challenge for discovery in skill learning: toward self-regulated and representative adaptation

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Education · Vol 11 · 0 citations · 72 references

Abstract

Skill learning is often discussed in terms of closely related but insufficiently integrated concepts: challenge, instructional methods, discovery, self-regulation, specificity, retention, and transfer. As a result, practice design is frequently reduced to either adjusting task difficulty or prescribing movement solutions more explicitly. Compounding this, learning is routinely inferred from immediate performance quality, even though performance and learning unfold on different timescales and across qualitatively distinct contexts. This Perspective article advances a different view: skill learning is best understood as the progressive differentiation and calibration of affordance relations under functionally representative constraints. On this view, challenge is not a fixed property of tasks but a learner-relative, information-generating relation among the learner, the task, and the performance context. Discovery is the exploratory process through which learners search, differentiate, tune, and stabilize affordance relations. Self-regulation is the recursive process through which learners define tasks, monitor consequences, sustain motivation, and adapt their actions over time. Specificity is reframed through representative learning design, where the critical requirement is not superficial resemblance or high-fidelity mimicry but functional equivalence between practice and performance: the preservation of the affordances, timing demands, and constraints that regulate skilled activity. Improvement, in turn, is judged not by immediate performance gains alone but by retention, transfer, adaptability, and the development of self-regulatory capacity. Together, these claims reposition challenge, discovery, self-regulation, and representative learning design as interdependent elements of a single learning-design problem. The reframing carries direct implications for how improvement should be defined and evaluated, and for how practitioners across physical education, sport, coaching, and therapy might design conditions for durable, transferable, and adaptive skill.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

From Self-Regulated to Hybrid-Regulated Learning: Reframing Regulation in the Age of AI

It is argued that effective regulation in AI-rich environments depends not only on learners’ strategic abilities but also on their capacity to critically manage and interpret AI support, as well as the critical literacies required to engage with them.

H. Reinders · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Teacher-Mediated AI Regulation: A Developmental Equity Framework for K–12 Metacognitive Learning

Personalization without autonomy is not necessarily education. Artificial intelligence (AI) can adapt support to individual learners, yet the same system may prompt planning and reflection in one classroom while supplying answers in another. This conceptual paper addresses that divergence through the Teacher-Mediated A...

Sahil Yousuf · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

MICRO-LEARNING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT COGNITIVE TRANSFER IN HIGH-LOAD LEARNING CONDITIONS

As higher education increasingly addresses complex and interdisciplinary knowledge, students are frequently required to process substantial amounts of information within limited timeframes. Such high-load learning conditions may constrain knowledge retention and the transfer of learning to new contexts. This paper exam...

Răzvan Bărbulescu, V. Enǎchescu · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Progressive Contextual Scaffolding Framework for Developing Engineering Students' Expressive Competence

Expressive competence does not emerge automatically from isolated competitions or short-term training. It develops through sustained task engagement, structured practice, diverse feedback, and transfer across contexts. To address low willingness to speak, weak organization, and limited professional transfer among first...

Ping Li, Sai-Yu Hou, Zihan Ha et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Understanding Learner Autonomy, Self-Directed Learning, and Self-Regulated Learning Through the Lens of Learner Control

Learner autonomy (LA), self-directed learning (SDL), and self-regulated learning (SRL) are often used interchangeably in educational research, yet they originate from different fields and are not fully interchangeable. This paper explores the similarities and differences among these constructs, highlighting their disci...

Taha Ouadani, Adil Azhar, Youssef Nadri · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Metacognitive Steering: Learning the Structure of Scientific Judgment

This work introduces Metacognitive Steering, an inference-time controller that reads the model's cognitive regime and dynamically composes layer-specific interventions for exploration, procedural convergence, or critical reassessment without modifying model parameters.

Vincent Karpf, Joseph Reth, Eike Gerhardt et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.