Skip to content
Review Open access

A Deep Dive into Fairness, Bias, Threats, and Privacy in Recommender Systems: Insights and Future Research

Sep 2024 · ACM Computing Surveys · Vol 58, pp. 1 - 39 · 4 citations · 282 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This study shows how algorithmic choices can unintentionally reinforce disparities, and reviews strategies for fair recommendation and privacy-preserving learning, and synthesizes current limitations and outline future directions to improve threat resilience, fairness and privacy.

Abstract

Recommender systems personalize digital experiences across e-commerce, streaming, and social media, yet they face linked challenges in fairness, bias, threats, and privacy. Bias can lead to unequal treatment, so fairness seeks equitable recommendations for all stakeholders. At the same time, adversarial attacks can erode reliability, and extensive use of personal data creates privacy risks that demand robust safeguards. This study surveys these challenges, shows how algorithmic choices can unintentionally reinforce disparities, and reviews strategies for fair recommendation and privacy-preserving learning. We frame these aspects with a unified Privacy–Accuracy–Fairness plus Threat framework that spans data retrieval, ranking and serving, and we advocate standardized evaluation on fixed candidate item pools to isolate tradeoffs between quality and responsibility metrics. By integrating these dimensions, we synthesize current limitations and outline future directions to improve threat resilience, fairness and privacy. We also situate the discussion in ethical and regulatory contexts and translate those principles into practical controls that foster trustworthy systems for diverse populations.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Book Open access Sep 2026

What Price Fairness? Evaluating Energy – Fairness – Accuracy Trade-off in Recommender Systems

The results show that the green cost of fairness is not uniform, post-processing shifts cost to repeated serving, while in-processing and graph-level methods avoid re-ranking overhead but vary substantially across models, datasets, and hardware.

Abhirup Mitra, Oleg Lesota, Antonela Tommasel · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Exploring Backdoor Vulnerabilities and Fairness Challenges in Generative Models: A Survey

This is the first study combining surveys of backdoor attacks and fairness in AI models to examine security vulnerabilities that can lead to bias susceptibility and unfair outcomes, providing a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and progress in ensuring fairness and security in AI systems.

Ryan Holland, Shantanu Pal, Lei Pan · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Long-Term Fairness-Aware Recommendation via Adaptive Fairness Metric Selection

The proposed Long-term Fairness-aware Recommendation via Adaptive Fairness Metric Selection (LFR-via-AFMS) adaptively selects the most appropriate fairness criterion: Equal Opportunity for true causality, and Demographic Parity for spurious correlations, which eliminates unjustified disparities entirely.

Ji-Jun Yu, Minghua Xiong · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

A Privacy Budgeting Framework for Online Experimentation

This work analytically finds privacy risk budgets that optimally balance exploration and exploitation and applies them to a firm-wide privacy risk budget, and finds that the dynamic strategy is particularly valuable in longer and more complex experiments, and that optimizing the allocation of a firm-wide privacy risk b...

Gilian R. Ponte, Alina Ferecatu · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Oct 2026

Algorithmic Bias in AI Marketing: Implications for Consumer Equity and Brand Reputation

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly embedded in targeting, personalization, pricing, recommendation, and content-generation systems, intensifying concerns about algorithmic bias and its consequences for consumers and brands. This critical literature review synthesizes peer-reviewed and applied research publish...

Mohammadali Shahbandi · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

iCert-Fair: A Human-Preference-Guided Two-Layer Framework for Multi-Objective Fairness Assessment and Harm Recovery in Credit Scoring

The empirical findings support the use of complementary structural and policy-level interventions and demonstrate the importance of jointly evaluating aggregate disparity, worst-case attribute-level harm, cross-attribute transfer, and predictive utility.

Rashed Bahlool, Nabil Hewahi · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.