Conformal Privacy Auditing is introduced, a distribution-free calibration framework that provides a statistical certificate of re-identification risk for each released document against LLM-empowered adversaries and enables audits of open-source models and proprietary API models in a unified framework.
Abstract
Empirical identity leakage from released text is increasingly driven by attackers that combine large language models (LLMs) with auxiliary knowledge to link documents to individuals. Existing audits typically report success rates for specific attack pipelines but lack finite-sample statistical guarantees, while training-time protections such as differential privacy are difficult to translate into release-time decisions for individual natural-language documents. We introduce Conformal Privacy Auditing(CPA), a distribution-free calibration framework that provides a statistical certificate of re-identification risk for each released document against LLM-empowered adversaries. CPA outputs a conformal ambiguity set of candidate identities that is guaranteed to contain the true identity with user-chosen confidence under exchangeability, together with an interpretable leakage proxy derived from set size. CPA supports both logit-access and sampling-only attackers, enabling audits of open-source models and proprietary API models in a unified framework. Across multiple release benchmarks and attacker configurations, CPA achieves calibrated coverage and reveals sharp shifts in certified identifiability as auxiliary knowledge, LLM augmentation, and release mechanisms vary, providing a statistically grounded basis for reporting and comparing release-time linkage risk across attacker configurations, datasets, and release mechanisms alike.
Private Evolution (PE) generates high-fidelity synthetic data in federated settings without exposing users'raw data. It aggregates clipped user votes over a shared candidate bank into a differentially private histogram, with noise calibrated to the worst-case user contribution. However, it is unclear whether an adversa...
Sai Aparna Aketi, Enayat Ullah, Shripad Gade· 0 citations
A privacy-preserving zk-SNARK-based audit framework that searches for probes designed in the spirit of adversarial examples to amplify logit drift between an approved model and a modified deployment and demonstrates that token-based probes consistently deliver the strongest mean sensitivity across models and GPU platfo...
Cameron Wilding, Mina Shaker, Fatemeh Ganji· 0 citations
Differentially private (DP) text generation can protect individual records, but privacy alone does not specify what evidence a released statement carries about the underlying data. We identify this as an evidence gap: a private report may contain plausible claims without indicating whether they are strongly supported b...
GuardianAgent, a policy-conditioned anonymization framework that couples structured risk assessment with verified adaptive rewriting, achieves the strongest privacy-utility trade-off among published baselines and is the only method to reach more than 0.90 privacy in all three domains, remaining robust under a backbone...
Rui-Yi Yang, Gayathri Lihinikaduarachchi, Rahat Masood et al.· 0 citations
This work investigates a probabilistic variant of PCD, where an LLM-driven probabilistic estimation of k-anonymity is augmented with an LLM-driven probabilistic estimation of k-anonymity, and proposes k-anonymity as a useful auxiliary metric for tackling PCD.
This paper presents a systematic framework for membership inference attacks, in which an adversary with only black-box query access to a deployed classifier determines whether a specific individual's record was part of its training set.
Pramod Prakash· International Journal of Int...· 0 citations