Skip to content
Review Open access

Hybrid Post-Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Key Distribution Co-Design for Quantum-Safe 6G, O-RAN, and IoT Infrastructure

Sep 2026 · International Journal of Applied Smart Interdisciplinary Technologies · 0 citations

TL;DR

The engineering case for combining post-quantum cryptography (PQC) with quantum key distribution (QKD) as a strategy for securing next-generation communication infrastructure, focusing on 6G core and radio-access networks, Open RAN (O-RAN), and constrained Internet of Things (IoT) deployments is examined.

Abstract

Cryptographically relevant quantum computers do not yet exist, but the transition away from classical public-key cryptography is already underway: adversaries can record encrypted traffic today and decrypt it once a sufficiently capable quantum computer becomes available, a threat known as harvest-now, decrypt-later. This paper examines the engineering case for combining post-quantum cryptography (PQC) with quantum key distribution (QKD) as a strategy for securing next-generation communication infrastructure, focusing on 6G core and radio-access networks, Open RAN (O-RAN), and constrained Internet of Things (IoT) deployments. Rather than treating the two mechanisms as symmetric, interchangeable layers, the paper examines what each one actually guarantees, surveys the empirical evidence available for deployment cost, and describes where national security authorities and standards bodies disagree on the value of QKD. The architecture is grounded in the finalized National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) PQC standards and its 2025 hybrid key-establishment guidance, drawing on empirical Open RAN latency and energy measurements published during 2025 and 2026, embedded-hardware benchmarks for constrained devices, and the small number of quantum key distribution deployments operating at metropolitan or national backbone scale today. The paper is explicit about which figures are measured results and which remain illustrative proposals, and it closes by naming the specific standardization and field-trial gaps that separate current practice from the architecture it describes. The purpose of the work is to give network architects and policymakers a single, evidence-graded reference for deciding where each mechanism belongs in a real deployment, rather than treating post-quantum and quantum-distributed keying as equivalent options.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Beyond encryption: post-quantum cryptography and the future of quantum-safe networks

This analysis demonstrates that while hybrid PQC-QKD models reduce long-term key compromise probabilities to near 0%, they introduce a 15% to 40% increase in bandwidth overhead during initial cryptographic handshakes during initial cryptographic handshakes.

R. Delhibabu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Post-Quantum Cryptography Migration in Internet Protocols: A Review of ML-KEM Hybrid Key Exchange in TLS and SSH

The review argues that readiness depends on protocol binding, implementation behavior, monitoring, and governance as much as on algorithm strength, and develops a deployment-readiness framework with four layers: security continuity, protocol integration, operational observability, and crypto-agility.

Yan Zhang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Secure Medical Data Transmission Using Quantum Key Distribution and Post-Quantum Cryptography in Real-World Fiber Networks

This work demonstrates a field-deployed quantum-secure network integrating entanglement-based QKD with end-to-end PQC over 140 km of installed fiber in Thuringia, Germany, connecting a rural health kiosk to a university hospital via a trusted-node architecture comprising heterogeneous underground and aerial fiber links...

Vasile-Laurentiu Dosan, Paul Spooren, Sebastian Moeckel et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Trust-aware hybrid QKD–PQC key management for quantum-safe communication networks

This paper presents a dual-layer, trust-aware key-management framework that uses BB84 QKD as the primary channel and a Ring-LWE/Kyber key-encapsulation mechanism as a quantum-safe fallback, governed by a controller monitoring the quantum bit-error rate (QBER) and a trust signal.

A. Agalya, K. Priyadarsini · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

The intersection of post-quantum cryptography and QaaS: architecting quantum-safe cloud infrastructures

A 4-tier security framework tailored for Quantumas-a-Service (QaaS) deployments, focusing on securing data-in-transit, demonstrates the viability of modern latticebased cryptography for live environments and provides a structured 3-phase transition roadmap for cloud service providers (CSPs) to achieve quantum-resilienc...

Akshay Joseph, R. Delhibabu · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Trends in Quantum Key Distribution Technologies: A Systematic Review of Protocols, Network Architectures, and Deployment Challenges

Through a comprehensive evaluation of QKD protocols and network architectures, this study highlights the critical research gaps and provides future directions for the practical deployment of the QKD enabled secure communication networks.

Anugraha Saji, Anju Pratap · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.