ASSESSMENT OF THE BIO- STIMULATORY IMPACT OF T-PRF COMPARED TO T-PRF AUGMENTED WITH DIODE LASER IN DENTAL IMPLANTS FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF POSTERIOR MANDIBULAR TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
Aug 2026· Genetics and Molecular Research· 0 citations· 9 references
TL;DR
Adjunctive use of LLLT with T-PRF effectively reduced early postoperative pain but did not provide significant additional benefits regarding implant stability or bone density compared with T-PRF alone.
Abstract
Background: Successful dental implant therapy primarily depends on osseointegration, a biological process involving sequential bone healing and remodeling around the implant surface. Bio-stimulatory approaches such as Titanium Prepared Platelet Rich Fibrin (T-PRF) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) have gained attention because of their potential to enhance tissue regeneration, improve implant stability, and accelerate healing. Aim: To assess and compare the bio-stimulatory impact of T-PRF alone and T-PRF augmented with diode laser therapy in dental implants placed for replacement of posterior mandibular teeth. Materials and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial included 50 patients with unilateral posterior mandibular edentulous spaces requiring implant-supported rehabilitation. Patients were randomly allocated into two equal groups: Group A received T-PRF alone, whereas Group B received T-PRF combined with LLLT. Implant stability was assessed using Resonance Frequency Analysis and Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) values at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Bone density was evaluated using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), while postoperative pain was assessed using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at different postoperative intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Both groups demonstrated progressive improvement in implant stability and peri-implant bone density during follow-up. The T-PRF + LLLT group showed lower postoperative pain scores compared with T-PRF alone, with a statistically significant difference observed on postoperative Day 2 (p<0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between groups regarding implant stability or bone density. Conclusion: Adjunctive use of LLLT with T-PRF effectively reduced early postoperative pain but did not provide significant additional benefits regarding implant stability or bone density compared with T-PRF alone.
T titanium-reinforced d-PTFE membranes may offer mechanical advantages in space maintenance and dimensional stability, particularly in larger vertical defects; however, the available comparative evidence did not demonstrate a consistent statistically significant superiority over collagen-based approaches.
Chloé Duchatelle, Rosana Costa, Ana Sofia Vinhas et al.· Journal of Functional Biomat...· 0 citations
T-PRF-treated sites showed a trend towards increased early implant stability and decreased crestal bone loss compared to control sites, however, conclusive evidence cannot be drawn about the clinical superiority of T-PRF because of the small sample size and short follow-up period.
Anuraga Tejaswi Thotimpuri, M. Pasupuleti, G. Penmetsa et al.· Journal of Advanced Periodon...· 0 citations
Neither the choice of drilling technique nor the implant macrogeometry significantly influences insertion torque or stability levels in regions of low bone density in this randomized controlled clinical study.
Worood A Akram, S. Bede· The Journal of craniofacial...· 0 citations
PURPOSE
Healthy peri-implant soft tissues are essential for implant longevity. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has emerged as a promising additional approach for enhancing wound healing after implant surgery, but evidence remains inconsistent. This study evaluates the clinical, radiographic, and inflammatory effects of...
Shangtong Sun, Miaomiao Yang, Kui Zhang et al.· The International Journal of...· 0 citations
In edentulous maxilla with insufficient bone width, both the association of i-PRF+DBBM and DBBM alone were effective in providing bone width gain for implant placement, and the association of DBBM with i-PRF showed similar outcomes compared with DBBM alone for the studied parameters.
Gabriel Rodrigues Oliveira, Vínicius Fabris, Alfonso Sánchez-Ayala et al.· Clinical Oral Investigations· 0 citations
Background: Prolonged orthodontic treatment duration remains a major clinical concern because of its association with root resorption, enamel decalcification, periodontal complications, and reduced patient compliance. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF), a second-generation autologous platelet concentrate rich in g...
Benezer Rapsang, Vaibhav Misra, A. Garg et al.· International Journal of Cli...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.