Skip to content
Preprint

LinearKV: One Cached State Suffices for Position-Independent Caching in Hybrid LLMs

Jul 2026 · 1 citation · 32 references
Computer Science

Abstract

LLM serving is increasingly accelerated by position-independent caching (PIC). Existing PIC methods, however, are built for full-attention models, where a token-indexed KV cache underlies its core operations: matching reusable token chunks, concatenating their KV entries, and selectively recomputing a few tokens to restore cross-chunk context. Hybrid LLMs break these primitives---they replace most attention layers with linear recurrences that expose only a fixed-size state, leaving no token-indexed KV to concatenate or to locally repair. This raises a natural question: can PIC benefit hybrid models, and what would it take? We present LinearKV, a training-free hybrid-PIC framework. Its key insight is a \emph{decoupled initialization}: each linear layer maps its $K$ matched local states to a single initial state, while full-attention layers concatenate their KV as before. LinearKV is therefore compatible with existing PIC methods, reusing their token selection and recomputation as-is. Under this framework, we find that a \emph{single cached state} suffices as the linear layer's initializer. The algebraically principled alternative---composing all $K$ cached states into the exact full-prefix state, as concurrent work HYPIC does---is unnecessary and, on some architectures, even harmful. We compare the two across three hybrid models and three PIC selectors. On the two GDN models the two tie, both recovering most of full quality (up to $92\%$); on the Mamba-2 model, exact composition instead collapses under every selector---under EPIC, for instance, it recovers only $46.6\%$ of full quality, versus $86.8\%$ for a single cached block initializer. A single state initializer is also cheaper, cutting time-to-first-token to $0.46\times$ full prefill versus a further $5$--$17\%$ overhead for exact composition; results hold across LongBench QA and RULER at 8K--32K.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Preserving Admission Responsibility in Multi-Tenant Large Language Model Prefix Caches

Results show that object-value signals rank what to retain, while persistent responsibility determines which group bears reclamation pressure, which shows that object-value signals rank what to retain, while persistent responsibility determines which group bears reclamation pressure.

Zhi-Yu Wang, Rajkummar Buyya · 2 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Every Cache Entry Earns Its Place: Global Allocation of Resolution and Coverage for KV Cache Compression

GraceKV is proposed, a global approach for the allocation of resolution and coverage in KV cache compression, and the compression process is formulated as a global resource allocation problem under a fixed cache budget to validate the effectiveness of global budget allocation in coordinating information coverage and lo...

Haolin Tian, Yuzhe Liu, Tong-Han Wang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

HiSparse: Scaling Sparse-Attention Decoding with Hierarchical KV Cache Management

HiSparse is merged into upstream SGLang and evaluated across three sparse-attention families (DSA, NSA, and Quest) on H200, B200, and GH200 platforms: it improves peak generation throughput by up to 4.7x on long-context workloads while preserving comparable per-token latency and reducing time-to-first-token at high loa...

Zhiqiang Xie, Zhangheng Huang, Ting-Jun Huang et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.