Skip to content
Open access

Bilateral Labeled Sequent Calculi

Fabio De Martin Polo
Aug 2026 · Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic · Vol 67, pp. 381-423 · 1 citation · 21 references

TL;DR

A bilateral labeled sequent calculus incorporating specific verification and falsification rules incorporating specific verification and falsification rules is introduced on Heinrich Wansing’s constructive connexive logic C, shown to exhibit key structural properties.

Abstract

This article investigates the proof theory of contra-classical logics, with a focus on Heinrich Wansing’s constructive connexive logic C. Drawing on Wansing’s semantic bilateral framework—which characterizes connectives in terms of support of truth and support of falsity—we introduce a bilateral labeled sequent calculus incorporating specific verification and falsification rules. The resulting calculus is shown to exhibit key structural properties: All logical rules are height-preserving invertible, all structural rules are height-preserving admissible, and the cut rule is admissible. Moreover, the system, proven to be both sound and complete, allows for terminating proof search and the extraction of countermodels from failed root-first proof search. Finally, the computational complexity of the resulting decision procedure is established. The article concludes with some observations on systems related to C, such as C3 and N4, and outlines potential directions for future work.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

Gentzen systems and Beth tableaux

This paper provides an expository comparison of two foundational proof systems in classical propositional logic: Gentzen's sequent calculus and Beth's semantic tableaux. Gentzen's sequent calculus is presented as a rule-based system built upon the single axiom $\alpha \Rightarrow \alpha$, whose key feature — the subfor...

Zuzanna Rygiewicz · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

A decision procedure for intuitionistic modal logic IS4 (and IK4)

In this paper, we show that the two intuitionistic modal logics IS4 and IK4 are decidable. We provide a constructive decision procedure, that, given a formula, produces either a proof showing the formula to be valid or a finite countermodel falsifying the formula, thus also proving the finite model property for both lo...

Marianna Girlando, Roman Kuznets, Sonia Marin et al. · 1 citation
Open access Sep 2026

Domain Theory Meets Interaction Trees in Rocq

We present a domain-theoretical formalization of interaction trees in the Rocq prover. Unlike existing formalizations, ours does not rely on Rocq's built-in coinduction. Hence, we avoid complications occurring in earlier works, such as artificially including silent steps to comply with Rocq's productivity checker, trea...

David Nowak, Vlad Rusu · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Towards a Proof-Theoretic Analysis of Incorrect/Incomplete Proofs

It is shown that the epsilon calculus provides a natural framework for analyzing tolerance of falsity in proofs and for identifying conditions under which an incorrect proof can be semantically repaired.

Matthias Baaz, Mariami Gamsakhurdia · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Embedding Modal Logics into Logics of Bunched Implications

We present a new proof of the embedding of the classical modal logic S4 into the logic of Boolean Bunched Implications (BBI). While the original proof is semantical, this proof is entirely syntactical. It proceeds via Hilbert-style calculi, and is built by analogy with a recently discovered proof by Godel of the embedd...

Daniele Sansoni, Ranald Clouston · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

New Proofs of Weak Normalization for Propositional Logic

New proofs of weak normalization for intuitionistic and classical propositional logics (with the full set of operators -- falsum, implication, conjunction and disjunction) are presented and a deterministic algorithm for weak normalization is presented.

S. Suresh · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.