Skip to content
Preprint

Fermionic quantum error correction is never free

Sep 2026 · 1 citation · 66 references
Physics

TL;DR

This work shows that the logical space of any non-trivial fermionic error-correcting code contains no pure fermionic Gaussian state, utilizing a fundamental incompatibility between fermionic error correction and Wick's theorem.

Abstract

Fermionic platforms offer compelling architectures for quantum computing, ranging from topologically protected Majorana-based qubits to fermionic cold atoms. To achieve scalability, however, they require quantum error correction. In this work, we prove that any exact and sufficiently accurate approximate fermionic quantum error correction necessarily requires non-Gaussian operations, beyond the free-fermion regime of quadratic dynamics. This is in sharp contrast to the qubit setting, where the efficiently classically simulable stabilizer operations form the standard framework for quantum error correction. Specifically, we show that the logical space of any non-trivial fermionic error-correcting code contains no pure fermionic Gaussian state, utilizing a fundamental incompatibility between fermionic error correction and Wick's theorem. We further show that the required number of bounded-weight non-Gaussian gates for unitary codeword preparation grows at least linearly with both the code distance and the number of encoded modes, revealing an intrinsic resource overhead that increases simultaneously with error-protection strength and logical capacity. Furthermore, we analyze the performance of fermionic Gaussian operations in entanglement distillation, revealing a distinction from their bosonic counterparts. Our results reveal fundamental difficulties for fermionic error correction from the perspectives of both physical implementation and classical simulation, suggesting connections to fermionic phases of matter and state preparation complexity.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Oct 2026

The magic cost of fermionic randomness

Sampling-based quantum advantage raises a basic resource question: how much non-Gaussianity is needed to reproduce the random-matrix statistics often associated with quantum chaos? Passive fermionic linear optics preserves Gaussian structure, and even Haar-random mode mixing fails to anticoncentrate for Slater inputs....

Chen-Feng Cao, Yi-Fan Tang, J. Eisert · 1 citation
Preprint Sep 2026

Design Principles for Ultra-High-Rate Quantum Codes

This work develops and analyzes principles for exploring this design space, and uses them to design compact code constructions with improved performance, and develops symmetry-informed strategies for identifying low-weight logical bases.

Jong-Ye-On Lee, K. Okada, N. Maskara et al. · 8 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Certifying fermionic Gaussian states (and a little more) with optimal precision dependence

Fermionic Gaussian states are the workhorse reference states for qubit-based quantum simulation of fermionic systems, yet existing certification protocols either proceed via fidelity estimation, leading to suboptimal sample complexity in the target precision $\epsilon$, only apply to Haar-typical states, or require ada...

Ninnat Dangniam, Laphas Premcharoen, Metrasit Sripech et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Quantum Codes for Generalized Amplitude-damping Noise

This work constructs a five-qubit permutation-invariant code that, under probabilistic recovery, achieves a fidelity loss quadratic in the damping strength, thus outperforming existing QEC codes.

Sourav Dutta, A. Rudra, Manav Seksaria et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Bosonic Error Correction with Fluxonium

Bosonic quantum error correction (QEC) offers a hardware-efficient route to fault-tolerant quantum computing. To date, however, superconducting circuit implementations of bosonic codes have utilized centimeter-scale 3D microwave cavities controlled by fixed-frequency transmon qubits, with logical lifetimes limited by t...

Shantanu R. Jha, Shoumik Chowdhury, Gabriele Rolleri et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Fault-tolerant quantum computation cannot be achieved with constant spacetime overhead

This work establishes fundamental limits on the resources required for quantum fault tolerance, and gives a positive-rate CSS code construction that attains the memory bound, and identifies sufficient conditions under which the same scaling extends from quantum memory to fault-tolerant circuit implementations.

Kishor Bharti, Tobias Haug, Andrew Tanggara · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.