Skip to content
Review

The Review of Law, International Politics and Economics AI Governance, Digital

TL;DR

It is argued that AI-driven platforms often, even unintentionally, marginalize vulnerable groups—such as those in remote areas, senior citizens, individuals with impairments, and individuals with impairments.

View source

Similar papers

Oct 2026

AI in Mediation: Legal Effects and Trade Governance

This article examines artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted international commercial mediation through the interface between the EU AI Act and the Singapore Convention on Mediation. It argues that AI systems may be classified as high-risk where they go beyond administrative support and contribute to outcomes capable...

Nohyoung Park · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

AI Sovereignty, Data Bias, and Ethical Challenges in International Law

As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly shapes global governance, the concept of AI sovereignty raises significant legal and ethical concerns. A central challenge lies in systemic bias within dominant AI models, which are predominantly trained on Western data, languages, and cultural perspectives. Such bias infl...

N. Lo · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Reconceptualization of Digital Sovereignty: A Political–Philosophical Analysis

It is maintained that AI disrupts the traditional Westphalian principle of state sovereignty, arguing that true digital sovereignty requires more than technical infrastructure but a philosophically cohesive conception of collective self-determination in an increasingly interconnected world.

H. Q. Tran · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

CETS 225 and Digital Constitutionalism: The Asymmetric and Multilevel Governance of Algorithmic Power

This commentary examines the Council of Europe's Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law (CETS 225), the first legally binding international treaty on artificial intelligence, opened for signature in Vilnius on September 5, 2024. It argues that CETS 225 articulate...

Pedro Miguel Ángel Garita Arce · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Human-centric AI governance in the European Union. Accountability, fundamental rights, and institutional resilience in public administration

This Policy and Practice Review concludes that AI-enabled administration remains legitimate only where public authorities retain the capacity to understand, justify, correct, suspend and democratically control the systems they use.

A. Dragomir, Iulea Bulea, Lucian Tarnu · 2 citations
Open access Sep 2026

AI, Democracy and Environmental Justice in Africa

This paper analyzes the environmental cost of expanding AI data centers across Africa as such developments pose significant ecological risks, including land clearing, intensified water consumption, and the loss of native biodiversity. I argue that liberal democratic systems in many African contexts face the problem of...

Oluwakorede Ajibona · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.