Sep 2026· International Journal of Business Strategy and Innovation· Vol 1, pp. 147-161· 0 citations· 27 references
TL;DR
An interpretive framework linking six leadership competencies - digital literacy, strategic foresight, ethical judgement, ethical judgement, emotional intelligence, adaptive change capacity and distributed collaboration - to governance, policy, professional development, resourcing and accountability mechanisms is developed.
Abstract
Digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) are altering teaching, research, administration and institutional decision-making in higher education, but technological capability alone does not determine whether change is educationally valuable, equitable or trustworthy. This critical narrative review synthesises a purposively bounded corpus of 32 contemporary and foundational sources to examine which leadership capabilities and institutional mechanisms are required for responsible digital transformation. Rather than reporting empirical results, this study develops an interpretive framework linking six leadership competencies - digital literacy, strategic foresight, ethical judgement, emotional intelligence, adaptive change capacity and distributed collaboration - to governance, policy, professional development, resourcing and accountability mechanisms. The synthesis argues that hierarchical authority remains necessary for formal accountability but is insufficient when expertise is dispersed, and technological conditions change quickly. A contingent combination of transformational direction, distributed expertise and proportionate AI governance is therefore proposed. The framework further identifies institutional resources, mission, digital maturity, regulation and regional inequality as moderators, meaning that a single implementation model would reproduce rather than resolve inequity. Practical tables map competencies to interventions and AI risks to governance controls. This study contributes an institutionally actionable account of future-ready leadership while acknowledging the limits of a non-systematic, English-language conceptual corpus. It concludes that responsible innovation depends on leaders' capacity to connect technological judgement with human participation, ethical accountability and context-sensitive institutional design.
Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI) shifts educational leadership from whether to adopt a tool to which actions a configured system may take, under whose authority, and with what capacity for intervention and remedy. Through critical integrative synthesis of educational leadership, organisational decision-making, AI g...
Tamra Alshloul, Hosam R. I. Badawy, Hesham R. I. Badawy et al.· Frontiers in Education· 0 citations
Meta-Noetic Leadership is introduced as an emerging human-centred theory for educational leadership in the era of the Fifth Industrial Revolution and theoretical propositions and implications for responsible AI readiness, psychological safety, and systemic antifragility in schools are formulating.
Georgios Panagiotopoulos, Georgios Samaras, Zoe Karanikola et al.· European Journal of Contempo...· 0 citations
It is concluded that future-ready competencies are indispensable for educational administrators seeking to lead transformative change, strengthen institutional resilience, and enhance organisational performance in an increasingly interconnected and knowledge-driven world.
Abiodun Muftau Balogun, L. O. Yahya, Ikuenomore Samuel Oluwasayo et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
This article develops a bounded integrative synthesis of digital leadership, digital transformation and organizational performance in the Industry 5.0 context. It is explicitly conceptual rather than an empirical test. The evidence base combines five verifiable studies retained from the original manuscript with six sup...
Anson Leow Pei Iu, Anas Tajudin, Andy Chan Hsi Ming et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The study generated the framework Contextualizing Responsible AI Governance Through Adaptive School Leadership, which explains responsible AI governance as a continuing process of policy interpretation, contextual adaptation, institutional capacity building, ethical accountability, and stakeholder collaboration.
Venz Mae Siodo· QualiSearch Journal of Educa...· 0 citations