Skip to content
Open access

A framework for developing, validating, and utilizing automated measures of order errors using the retract-and-reorder methodology

Sep 2026 · JAMIA Open · Vol 9 · 0 citations · 56 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The methodology described can be applied to develop automated measures to detect a range of order error types, examine the epidemiology, and investigate the root causes of order errors in near-real-time, as well as rigorously evaluate the impact of preventive interventions.

Abstract

Abstract Objective Despite the recognized need to leverage health information technology (IT) to facilitate error detection, there are few health IT safety measures in use and limited resources available to guide the conceptualization, development, and testing of new measures. Audit log data provide a rich source of clinician behaviors within the electronic health record (EHR), which can be used to develop health IT safety measures. Materials and Methods With illustrative examples, we describe a framework for the development and evaluation of novel order error measures by employing the Retract-and-Reorder (RAR) methodology, which uses audit log data to identify actions indicative of potential order errors. Results Topics covered include the following: (1) insight into the value of large data repositories generated during clinical care for creating automated health IT safety measures, (2) the principles and theoretical model that underly the ability of RAR measures to detect order errors, (3) an experience-based framework for the conceptualization, implementation, validation, and optimization of new RAR measures to detect order errors, and (4) applications of RAR measures to guide understanding of health IT safety events. Discussion This report is intended for informatics and health services researchers and healthcare system leadership who seek to utilize EHR audit log data to identify and quantify order errors in EHR systems. Conclusion The methodology described can be applied to develop automated measures to detect a range of order error types, examine the epidemiology, and investigate the root causes of order errors in near-real-time, as well as rigorously evaluate the impact of preventive interventions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Development of a Framework for Evaluating Large Language Model Safety and Reliability: a Proof-of-Concept Evaluation

Large language models (LLMs) are entering clinical decision support faster than methodology can characterise their safety. Aggregate accuracy treats all errors as interchangeable and cannot support safe deployment under Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) and EU AI Act frameworks. To develop and demonstrate a framework...

Fang-Yan Liu, Zhi Liu, Xiaolu Fei et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

The Incidence and Evaluation of Quality Indicators for Patient Safety Across the Total Testing Process in the Clinical Laboratory

Introduction: Quality indicators (QIs) are useful evaluation tools that enable the identification of clinical laboratory performance levels and can be used to assess critical healthcare dimensions depending on the objective measures. Standardized and recognized QIs are used to monitor clinical laboratory errors and to...

Patricia Aboagye Boateng · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

From Output Errors to Workflow Harm: A Practitioner-Audit Method for LLM-Mediated Research

TRACE (Tracking Reliability of AI-generated Conversational Evidence), a practitioner-audit framework for evaluating the downstream workflow reliability of conversational AI, is presented, suggesting taxonomy legibility under standardized conditions even where human judgment diverged.

D. Austria, B. McCollister, J. Lindsey et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Methods to derive composite indicators used for quality and safety measurement and monitoring in healthcare: a scoping review

Introduction The use of composite measures of quality in healthcare is widespread and designing such measures involves many technical decisions. Their use can be controversial due to concerns around transparency, appropriateness and uncertainty. This scoping review identified the methodologies adopted and methods used...

T. McDonnell, Jaspreet Kaur Dullat, Kathleen McDonnell et al. · 1 citation
Review Open access Aug 2026

The CODEX action incubator: a consensus-driven approach to identify and implement diagnostic excellence measures in the context of artificial intelligence

Abstract Diagnostic errors are a substantial source of patient harm. As artificial intelligence (AI) integrates into clinical workflows, opportunities are emerging to assess their impacts on diagnostic excellence (DxEx). The Coordinating Center for Diagnostic Excellence (CODEX) at the University of California San Franc...

B. Rosner, Molly Hammer, Aaron Tabacco et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.