Aug 2026· IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence· Vol PP· 11 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
This survey bridges the existing gap by presenting a comprehensive blueprint for scientific agents' design and introduces a unified taxonomy based on capability envelope and capability maturity, characterizing both the scope of scientific workflow coverage and the reliability of agent behavior under realistic research conditions.
Abstract
The advancement of LLM-based agents is redefining AI for Science (AI4S) by enabling autonomous scientific research. Prominent LLMs exhibited expertise across multiple domains, catalysing constructions of domain-specialised scientific agents. Nevertheless, the profound epistemic and methodological gaps between AI and the natural sciences still impede the systematic design, training, and validation of these agents. This survey bridges the existing gap by presenting a comprehensive blueprint for scientific agents' design. It first clarifies the concept of scientific agents and distinguishes them from general-purpose agents in terms of their goal orientation, workflow embedding, and scientific commitments. It then introduces a unified taxonomy based on capability envelope and capability maturity, characterizing both the scope of scientific workflow coverage and the reliability of agent behavior under realistic research conditions. Building on this taxonomy, the survey further connects scientific agent design with the research life cycle by reviewing construction strategies, capability enhancement methods, evaluation paradigms, and future challenges. This unified perspective aims to provide practical guidance for designing domain-specific scientific agents and to promote the convergence of AI research and natural scientific discovery. To support long-term progress, we curate a live repository (AWESOME_SCIENTIFIC_AGENT) that continuously aggregates emerging methods, benchmarks, and best practices.
Overall, it is found that the use of coding agents in scientific computing holds great promise for accelerating scientific research and increasing the reliability of critical systems, but that outstanding concerns remain.
Jeremiah H. Li, Alex Rubinsteyn, Sergey Feldman et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This work argues that studying AI Scientists as human-agent systems (HAS) is both underexplored and undervalued, and calls for new research that adopts the HAS lens to develop mathematical frameworks for understanding and fostering human-AI synergy in scientific discovery.
P. Emami, Sameera Horawalavithana, T. Nguyễn et al.· 0 citations
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
The results suggest that advanced models like GPT-5.5 can run away with agentic AI systems, and advice for researchers and practitioners aiming to conceive future-ready, smart library systems is provided.
This review specifically addresses the mathematical foundations of autonomous reasoning through Bayesian probabilistic updating, constructs structural models of multi-agent collaborative topologies, evaluates the operational efficacy of specialized cybersecurity frameworks, and thoroughly examines the profound socio-te...
Arunanshu Chatterjee, A. Roy· Interdisciplinary Journal of...· 0 citations
Experimental results indicate that coordinated autonomous agents significantly reduce research time, improve workflow consistency, enhance knowledge discovery, and increase scientific productivity compared with conventional AI-based research assistants.
Anatoly Kitov, M. Kartsev· International Journal of Eme...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.