Drawing on metadata from more than five million scientific publications, this work examines how the convergence of AI and HPC correlates with scientific breakthroughs and shows that this computational synergy is most pronounced at the scientific frontier.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and high-performance computing (HPC) are transforming scientific capabilities and the way science is conducted. Yet their combined impact on scientific discovery remains poorly understood, as do inequalities in access to these capabilities across countries and institutions. Drawing on metadata from more than five million scientific publications (2000–2024) across 27 fields, we examine how the convergence of AI and HPC correlates with scientific breakthroughs. Our results show that this computational synergy is most pronounced at the scientific frontier: research combining AI and HPC is more likely to introduce novel ideas and achieve top-cited status than either conventional work or research using AI or HPC in isolation. We also document growing disparities in access to supercomputing resources and AI expertise, which are increasingly concentrated in a small number of regions (dominated by the United States and China, though the EU27 aggregate maintains high competitiveness in combined AI+HPC output). The future of discovery will depend not only on advances in algorithms and computing power, but also on enacting policies that democratise these capabilities across the global scientific ecosystem.
Overall, it is found that the use of coding agents in scientific computing holds great promise for accelerating scientific research and increasing the reliability of critical systems, but that outstanding concerns remain.
Jeremiah H. Li, Alex Rubinsteyn, Sergey Feldman et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
These studies show that AI-native NPUs can achieve numerical robustness, competitive performance, and satisfactory scalability when numerical formulation, execution placement, and data movement are addressed in a coordinated manner.
Weicheng Xue, Kai Yang, Yongxiang Liu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
The advancement of AI in science raises broader questions concerning the division of cognitive labour between human researchers and machines, and a typology of AI systems used in research is proposed, ranging from specialised scientific AI through scientific AI assistants and agents to hybrid experimental systems that...
P. Jedlička· Teorie vědy / Theory of Scie...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) is gaining traction in the social sciences and humanities (SSH). However, adoption remains limited by technical barriers to high-performance computing (HPC), validation processes that lag behind AI's rapid progress, and reproducibility standards that most SSH teams cannot meet. Research wor...
J. Giner-Miguelez, A. Malaga, Felipe L Gómez-Cortés et al.· 0 citations
PACES (Providing Accelerated Cybertraining for Emerging Scientists) is a collaborative NSF-funded cybertraining program promoting the adoption of advanced CI by providing hands-on training to researchers seeking to incorporate these resources in their own scientific workflows.
Wesley A. Brashear, Joshua Winchell, Halle Gray et al.· Practice and Experience in A...· 0 citations
BixBench3, a benchmark that measures the capacity of AI agents to process raw biological data through to scientific results, reveals that LLMs vary substantially in their ability to execute multiple sequential analysis steps coherently, manage large quantities of raw data, and work across scientific domains.
Zane Koch, A. Wassie, Javier Valdes-Aleman et al.· 3 citations· ⚡2
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.