A Comparative Study of Metallic Mild Steel Dampers and Fluid Viscous Dampers in Reinforced Concrete Structures Based on Nonlinear Time History Analysis

Abstract

Existing comparative studies on metallic mild steel dampers (SDs) and fluid viscous dampers (FVDs) are primarily limited by the coupling of device type with layout variations, the lack of a unified performance metric, and the absence of multi-level evidence under fixed structural configurations. This study overcomes these limitations by comparing SDs and FVDs under strictly identical conditions—same RC frame, same 26 damper locations, same ground motions, and a unified code-specified drift target—across frequent, design-basis, and rare earthquake levels, supplemented by energy dissipation and added damping ratio analyses. Under frequent earthquakes (FEs), the FVD achieves a maximum story-shear reduction of 33% and effectively controls inter-story drift through its velocity-dependent energy-dissipation mechanism. Under rare earthquakes (REs), the SD demonstrates superior performance, providing a 35% maximum story-shear reduction, while maintaining inter-story drift ratios within code-specified limits, owing to its combined stiffness and damping contributions. In terms of energy dissipation, the total cumulative energy dissipated by FVDs is 39.4–67.6% higher than that of SDs under the same ground motions, with added damping ratios averaging 2.42% for FVDs and 2.86% for SDs. These findings suggest that FVDs are more favorable for serviceability and frequent seismic performance, while SDs exhibit better response reduction effects under rare earthquake excitations.