The deployment of a cloud-based agentic environment, and the development of an interactive training workshop for the Gene Ontology Consortium are described, which suggest that building community capability with agentic AI is primarily a problem of access, workflow design, and training.
Abstract
Agentic AI has the potential to accelerate curation of biological databases and knowledge bases. However, uptake has been hindered by a number of challenges and obstacles, including access to agents and appropriate training. Here we describe how we have attempted to address and mitigate these challenges and obstacles through the deployment of a cloud-based agentic environment, and the development of an interactive training workshop for the Gene Ontology Consortium. Our cloud environment for agentic-assisted curation was based on the JupyterHub platform, and utilized Claude Code as a universal harness. This allows curators to interact with an agent session through a terminal running in the browser, and has additional benefits such as centralization of access through a single API gateway, removing the need for participants to manage subscriptions or install software locally. We created four training modules, walking participants through basic agentic tool use first and then working up to agentic biological pathway curation using the existing GO-CAM (GO Causal Activity Model) curation tool. Thirty-seven participants took part in the four-hour workshop. Our key takeaway from this workshop is that building community capability with agentic AI is primarily a problem of access, workflow design, and training. Removing technical barriers, introducing capabilities gradually, grounding exercises in familiar curation tasks, and giving curators direct experience evaluating agent output can provide a practical route toward building shared agentic AI capability in distributed scientific communities.
EvoOntology is introduced, a self-evolving ontology layer for data agents that encapsulates the ontology as an MCP server comprising a schema layer, a content layer, and a tool layer, enabling agents to actively query and interact with the ontology at runtime.
Mei-Duo Chong, Shao-Lei Zhang, Ju Fan et al.· 0 citations
AI agents are increasingly being developed and deployed across organizations using heterogeneous agent-development frameworks, AI models, tool interfaces, protocols, and execution environments. To realize their potential social and business impact, these agents must be able to interoperate through a common communicatio...
This work proposes CURATE - Composition, User-in-the-loop, Reuse, and Automated Task Execution - a novel human-in-the-loop multi-agent system that uses LLM agents to manage and develop composable workflows across their entire lifecycle.
Nolan Cutler, Chia-Chen Kuo, Nanda Velugoti et al.· 0 citations
This work represents agentic data as a common factorized object $(E,q,\tau,v)$, comprising an environment specification, task signal, interaction realization, and optional verifier, and formulate generation as constrained distribution design through the Accuracy-Complexity-divErsity (ACE) lens.
Xing-Shan Zeng, Zishan Xu, Bo-Ju Zhang et al.· 2 citations
A novel ReAct-based system called BobFlow is demonstrated, built on the idea of using dataflow as an abstraction for human-agent collaboration, which is especially friendly for LLMs to do their internal reasoning for data science tasks.
Jia-Lun Bai, Yicong Huang, Chen Li· Proceedings of the VLDB Endo...· 0 citations
The main conclusion is that practical Agentic IoT depends less on placing an entire agent at one tier than on partitioning perception, memory, reasoning, and action under explicit latency, privacy, reliability, and safety constraints.
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.