Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

AI-SAFE FlightNet : A Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence and Automation Framework for Predictive Flight Safety, Aircraft Health Intelligence, and Ground Operations Coordination

Sep 2026 · Figshare
Air Traffic Management and Optimization

Abstract

Aviation safety improvement remains a continuous engineering challenge because modern aircraft are sensor-dense, software-intensive, and operationally interconnected, while health and operations data often remain fragmented across onboard, maintenance, dispatch, and ground systems. This fragmentation can delay weak-signal recognition and coordinated response. This paper proposes AI-SAFE FlightNet, a Safety-Aware, Intelligent, Federated, Explainable Flight Automation Network that integrates aircraft data intelligence, onboard edge AI, subsystem digital twins, phase-aware predictive analytics, evidence-grounded coordination, ground operations support, federated fleet learning, and governance by design. The framework supports pilots, engineers, dispatchers, and maintenance controllers without replacing certified human authority or certified aviation systems. A formal model combines sensor, flight-phase, environmental, and maintenance-history variables to estimate risk trajectories, prioritize alerts, and generate auditable response packages. The proposed evaluation uses public engine-degradation and trajectory datasets, synthetic subsystem telemetry, simulated maintenance records, and digital-twin experiments. Expected contributions are earlier warning, improved maintenance readiness, faster aircraft-to-ground coordination, privacy-preserving fleet learning, explainable recommendations, and measurable operational risk reduction. The objective is improved resilience and decision support, not zero risk or unrestricted autonomous control.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 23, 2026

Q&A: How AI came to model the “messy” human mind

Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.