Skip to content

Expert Knowledge&Machine Understanding: Bridging Reactome's Ontology with LLM Semantic Embeddings

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 8 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This study explores whether human-written descriptions in Reactome can be used to infer the experts'defined global hierarchical structure and indicates that the global hierarchical structure of pathways can be inferred by experts textual metadata.

Abstract

Biological knowledgebases like Reactome provide high-quality pathways that include biological elements'relationships and textual descriptions (metadata). The quality of such pathways is granted by manual curation, that presents, however, significant scalability challenges. Lately, numerous NLP tools have been proposed to cope with this issue, leveraging textual information to automatically expand biological knowledgebases. However, little exploration has been done so far to assess whether relationships among textual descriptions mirror higher order biological relationships. This study explores whether human-written descriptions in Reactome can be used to infer the experts'defined global hierarchical structure. To test this, we extracted from Reactome the Homo Sapiens hierarchy of pathways and their reactions (Reactome Hierarchy), and used textual metadata to reconstruct a Semantic Hierarchy, combining a sentence transformer model (SPECTER2) with a modified agglomerative nesting algorithm and a graph reconstruction algorithm. Quantitative (Laplacian Spectral Distance and Bootstrapping) and qualitative (global topological metrics) analyses confirm our hypothesis and indicate that the global hierarchical structure of pathways can be inferred by experts textual metadata.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Jul 2026

LLMBDC: Language Model for Biological Domains Oriented Clustering of Gene Ontology

LLMBDC (Large Language Model for Biological Domains Oriented Clustering of Gene Ontology) provides a scalable, reproducible, and interpretable route to context-aware, system-level interpretation of GO enrichment results while preserving biological specificity.

Xi-Ming Ran, Jie Xu, Peng Jin et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Do General NLP Embeddings Capture Ontological Reasoning?

AVA is introduced, a systematic framework for evaluating whether embeddings distinguish logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs, and reveals a persistent gap between linguistic representation learning and ontology-level discrimination, challenging the assumption that strong NLP benchmark...

Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, S. Auer · 0 citations
Review

Sophocles’ Antigone as a Knowledge Graph through a Hybrid Collaborative Workflow with Ontology-Guided LLM Extraction

This work targets a KG for Sophocles’ Antigone that supports two coupled uses: structured retrieval, through integrity and competency questions expressed in SPARQL over dramatic structure and interpretive annotations; and interactive exploration, through a lightweight read client that navigates lines across languages,...

Apostolos Baniotis, Marsel Senka, Entisa Tzeortziana Komoritsan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

An ontology-guided knowledge graph and retrieval-augmented LLM framework for interpretable mental health assessment

An ontology-guided framework that integrates a Knowledge Graph, an Ontology-Informed Retrieval Classifier, and a Large Language Model for interpretable mental health detection from social media text demonstrates that the KG–ORC cross-validation gate measurably improves predictive reliability over single component basel...

Amina Tahir, Ghulam Mustafa, Muhammad Tanvir Afzal et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

When Does Bigger Help? A Controlled Study of LLM Scale for Ontology Learning

Findings show that model size alone is an insufficient selection criterion for OL and provide empirical guidance for reproducible LLM-assisted ontology engineering and indicate that architecture and model lineage can outweigh nominal parameter count.

Hamed Babaei Giglou, S. Auer, Jennifer D'Souza · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.