Skip to content

AGENT-O: A Semantic Agent Card Framework for Interoperable and Governed Healthcare AI Agents

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

AGENT-O supported semantic Agent Card representation and reporting assessment while revealing an evaluation-specification gap: evaluation and benchmark procedures were reported more consistently than runtime architecture, governance, and reproducibility.

Abstract

AGENT-O is a modular ontology framework that defines a semantic Agent Card for representing health-oriented AI agent systems and supports assessment of reporting completeness in scientific publications. AGENT-O was developed as an OWL 2/RDF ontology covering runtime, models, workflow, tools, clinical use, evaluation, provenance, governance, and reporting assessment. Evaluation included ontology inventory, OWL-RL reasoning, three SHACL suites, 12 SPARQL competency queries, three cases, and model-assisted reporting-completeness assessment of 279 papers across five dimensions. The ontology contained 1,962 RDF triples and 1,922 Protege axioms, with 252 active classes, 198 active object properties, and 51 datatype properties. All SHACL suites conformed on example graphs, all competency queries returned prespecified evidence, and all 279 papers were scored. Incomplete reporting was highest for runtime/architecture (84.6%), governance/safety (82.8%), and provenance/reproducibility (78.1%), compared with evaluation (25.8%) and benchmark-process alignment (29.8%). AGENT-O supported semantic Agent Card representation and reporting assessment while revealing an evaluation-specification gap: evaluation and benchmark procedures were reported more consistently than runtime architecture, governance, and reproducibility. AGENT-O provides a reusable ontology, semantic Agent Card profile, and reporting-completeness workflow for structured reporting and gap identification, but does not assess agent quality or deployment readiness.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Ontology-Driven Agents Skills for Selection of Building Datasets with various specifications

Selecting the correct dataset among Taiwan's nine building specifications requires knowledge of production lineage, legal basis, completeness constraints, and spatial-unit semantics that are rarely represented in machine-readable form, leaving large language model (LLM) agents prone to structurally unsuitable recommend...

Ting-Yi Lee, Jung-Hong Hong · 0 citations
Conference Open access Aug 2026

Assessing Knowledge Provenance Quality for CEO Decision Support: An OWL-DL Ontological Framework

The ontology demonstrates approaches to enhancing the precision of knowledge provenance and outlines the systematic engineering of a knowledge provenance ontology designed to improve its reliability for executive decision-making. Utilizing architectural principles, we propose a formal model that evaluates knowledge pro...

Carolina de Oliveira, Fernando Alvaro Ostuni Gauthier · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Authority Resolution Framework: A Five-Domain Ontology for Governing Who and What Decides, at Scale

As AI systems become increasingly capable of autonomous action, determining whether an agent is technically capable of performing an action is insufficient: the system must also determine whether the action is authorised in its context. This paper introduces the Authority Resolution Framework (ARF), a five-domain ontol...

Parviz Shariff · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

A Semantic Ontology-Based Model for Solidity Smart Contracts With an LLM-Assisted Natural-Language Query Use Case

Smart contracts increasingly support high-value and governance-critical blockchain applications, making precise program understanding important for reliable analysis and tooling. Many existing analysis tools rely on task-specific pipelines in which extracted program knowledge is not readily available as reusable and in...

Udsanee Pakdeetrakulwong, Suksawat Saelim, Naruapon Suwanwijit · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Oct 2026

EIO-Agents: The Missing Semantic Layer for AI Agent Evaluation

This work introduces EIO-Agents, an open specification for interoperable AI agent evaluation built on two layers: EIO provides that missing semantic contract, while PER preserves the resulting evaluation as a portable and verifiable system of record.

Fouad Bousetouane · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.