Fine-grained Adaptive Implicit Hate speech Detection (FAID) is proposed, a novel framework that first performs fine-grained classification and then adapts to specific categories, and significantly outperforms SOTA baselines.
Abstract
Unlike explicit attacks with obvious profanity, implicit hate speech hides malice within seemingly compliant expressions through metaphors and contextual hints, making its detection in online content review challenging. While existing PLM- or LLM-based methods perform well, they typically apply a single reasoning process to all samples. This overlooks fine-grained linguistic nuances and causes unnecessary computation for simpler cases. We observe that online hate speech is not monolithic but manifests in varied forms. We therefore define three fine-grained categories: Shallow, Targeted, and Context-Dependent. Accordingly, we propose Fine-grained Adaptive Implicit Hate speech Detection (FAID), a novel framework that first performs fine-grained classification and then adapts to specific categories. Specifically, for Shallow samples with surface-identifiable intents, the framework adopts lightweight prompt-tuning for rapid classification; for Targeted comments that bind malicious intent to concealed targets, we design knowledge augmentation to iteratively refine the model and reveal hidden targets; for Context-Dependent comments lacking background information, we utilize an agentic framework that automatically generates prompts to evolve context, infer missing background information and identify ambiguous malicious intents. This adaptive architecture focuses computational resources on complex implicit samples while avoiding redundant reasoning for shallow samples. Experiments on four benchmark datasets demonstrate that FAID significantly outperforms SOTA baselines.
The findings indicate that IndoBERT+LoRA provides a promising and resource-efficient approach for multi-domain Indonesian hate and abusive speech classification, while stricter leave-one-domain-out evaluation remains an important direction for future work.
Fergie Joanda Kaunang, Bhustomy Hakim, A. P. Thenata· Jurnal Minfo Polgan· 0 citations
A rejudge protocol is introduced that extends direct contradiction with decision-boundary perturbations and adversarial rationales to address the susceptibility of initially correct model judgments to annotator-style rebuttals and whether attack effectiveness differs across manipulation directions.
Junyu Lu, Kaiyuan Liu, Kai-Chun Wang et al.· 0 citations
Automated hate speech detection is routinely reported at accuracies above 98%. We show that for two widely
cited systems such figures are substantially artefacts of how their evaluation corpora were built, and we propose a model
and protocol designed to avoid the same traps. First, we reproduce Ali et al. (2023) and Ki...
Hafsat Mahe Omar, Abdulhakeem Ibrahim, Karatu Musa Tanimu et al.· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
This work compares the capability of generative LLMs under a five-condition prompt ablation against a fine-tuned DistilBERT token classifier at detecting self-repairs and suggests that a locally deployable encoder, given sufficient in-domain annotation, is a more plausible route to clinical self-repair detection than s...
R. Wu, S. Pugh, K. O'Connor et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
During poisoning, a trigger is injected into the forced-aligned time span of a chosen source word in the audio and replace only that word in the transcript, enabling precise semantic flips and composable sentence manipulation while avoiding many-to-one label artifacts.
An exploratory case study that applies explainable artificial intelligence techniques to analyze how Prompt Guard 2 distinguishes malicious from benign prompts finds that Prompt Guard 2's decisions rely on the cumulative contribution of many tokens rather than a few dominant ones, yet saliency-guided synonym substituti...
Fernando Outeda, Gustavo Betarte, J. Campo et al.· 0 citations