Jan 2026· SAGE Open Nursing· Vol 12· 0 citations· 10 references
Medicine
TL;DR
This commentary is deliberately framed as a focused extension of the original study’s individual-level findings to the institutional level, rather than a stand-alone organizational literature review, and its scope has been kept correspondingly concise.
Abstract
This letter is a cohmment on the SAGE Open Nursing article “Nursing Educators” Perspectives on the Integration of Artificial Intelligence Into Academic Settings” (Rony et al., 2025). This qualitative study provides valuable insights into nursing educators’ lived experiences with AI integration in Bangladesh, identifying key themes including perceived benefits, barriers, ethical considerations, educator readiness, and personalized learning potential. While the authors’ use of the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework effectively captures individual-level factors, I would like to elaborate on the institutional and systemic dimensions that are equally critical for sustainable AI integration in nursing education. In doing so, this letter extends their individual-level TPACK lens to the institutional, governance, and equity structures that determine whether AI can be adopted safely and equitably across nursing programmes, where AI-based tools are already being taken up at pace (Labrague & Al Sabei, 2025). This commentary is deliberately framed as a focused extension of the original study’s individual-level findings to the institutional level, rather than a stand-alone organizational literature review, and its scope has been kept correspondingly concise. The findings underscore that educators’ concerns extend beyond individual competencies to encompass broader institutional ecosystems. The participants’ observations that “there’s no training” and that they are being “handed tools without a manual” (Rony et al., 2025) reflect a systemic gap in implementation infrastructure rather than merely individual skill deficits. From an implementation science perspective, successful technology adoption requires attention to multiple contextual levels: the intervention itself, the inner organizational setting, the outer policy environment, and the individuals involved (Damschroder et al., 2022). Future research and practice should therefore consider developing
The review is expected to generate evidence-based insights that will inform nursing curricula, guide institutional policy on AI integration and highlight the critical evidence gap in the GCC region, including Oman, thereby contributing to the advancement of AI-ready nursing education internationally.
Manal Nasser Al Ghazali, Muhammad Riaz· BMJ Open· 0 citations
A scoping review aims to identify shortcomings in theoretical and empirical modeling of nursing students’ interprofessional collaboration competence (ICC), informing the development of more effective educational interventions for the ICC of nursing students, and others.
Aldin Striković, Eveline Wittmann, Johannes Krell et al.· MethodsX· 0 citations
Generative AI presents a paradox in nursing education as it enables innovation and personalised learning, but poses risks to academic integrity and deep learning when implementation lacks ethical consideration and pedagogical rigour.
Lucie Ramjan, Belinda McGrath, Clare Walters et al.· Journal of Clinical Nursing· 0 citations
Introduction: The integration of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) into nursing education faces challenges in linking theory to clinical application in complex family health contexts. Students struggle with efficiently accessing, appraising, and applying evidence influenced by sociocultural factors. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential but requires pedagogical design to foster critical thinking and ethical use beyond technical skills.Method: An action research with mixed methods was conducted with 100 nursing students. The intervention had four phases: participatory family diagnosis, AI-assisted evidence retrieval and validation, community educational workshops design and execution, and multi-level evaluation.Results: A significant shift in AI use from basic to strategic, with a 40% reduction in literature search time. Qualitative data revealed enhanced critical awareness and ethical reasoning, while quantitative results indicated 90% of students improved critical appraisal skills and 70% felt more confident in evidence-based decisions. The project impacted 100 families, with 90% trusting evidence-based recommendations.Conclusions: Integrating AI in experiential pedagogies like Design Thinking and Service-Learning effectively develops nursing competencies, ensuring technology adoption supports context-sensitive family health learning outcomes.
Maria Graciela Villalba-Condori, Carla Cuya-Zevallos· Publicaciones· 0 citations
To explore how nursing educators in Portuguese higher education institutions understand, value, and operationalize genomics within nursing education programs, a qualitative, exploratory study was conducted through online focus groups with nursing educators.
Maria João Silva, L. Guimarães, Catarina Costa et al.· International Nursing Review· 0 citations
A comprehensive four-stage nursing engagement framework is proposed that spans the entire DTx lifecycle of design, implementation, evaluation, and ethical governance, highlighting the indispensable role of nurses in the clinical deployment of DTx.
Yu-Hsiu Lin· Hu li za zhi The journal of...· 0 citations