2026· International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications· 0 citations· 53 references
TL;DR
The findings suggest that academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be focused solely on preventing fraud, and this needs to expand to support ethical digital literacy, redesign learning tasks that require human reasoning, and ensure fairness in automated decision-making systems.
Abstract
This study examines how Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming academic integrity in higher education, altering both learning opportunities and the risks associated with misconduct. As creative AI tools become embedded in everyday academic work, they provide valuable support for writing, research assistance, and skills development. Still, they also challenge long-held assumptions about authorship, originality, and assessment. Emerging evidence suggests that students are using AI in a variety of ways, from supporting legitimate learning to producing fully automated assignments. However, AI-driven integrity technologies, such as plagiarism detectors and authorship checking models, are becoming more effective but continue to face issues of bias, false positives, and limited transparency. This rapid shift has created a gap between technological change and academic readiness, highlighting the need for institutions to rethink assessment design, improve integrity frameworks, and foster a culture of responsible AI use, rather than relying solely on surveillance and sanctions. This review compiles the latest studies published between 2020 and 2025 to map current practices, risks, and policy responses. The findings suggest that academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence (AI) cannot be focused solely on preventing fraud. But this needs to expand to support ethical digital literacy, redesign learning tasks that require human reasoning, and ensure fairness in automated decision-making systems. The study concludes with recommendations for educators, researchers, and policymakers to balance innovation with responsibility to ensure that AI becomes a tool for transforming learning, rather than a threat to academic values.
Examination of student and faculty perceptions of generative AI, institutional responses to AI-related integrity challenges, and the effectiveness of AI detection tools suggests that AI detection tools remain unreliable as standalone mechanisms, with persistent risks of false positives and false negatives.
Promethi Das Deep· International Journal of Stu...· 0 citations
Current practices related to AI use are examined, focusing on LLM-based ghostwriting and the reliability of disclosed interactions as evidence of authentic use, and the possibility of mimicking authentic interactions, which raises concerns about the effectiveness of current approaches.
Artificial Intelligence should be viewed as an assistive technology that complements rather than replaces human expertise in teacher education research, and the implications for research quality, reliability, equity, and public trust in educational research are highlighted.
Dr Yudhvir Singh and Dr Geetu Gupta· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
This document outlines the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological underpinning of the AI-Augmented Pedagogy Integration Model (AAPIM), which has now been further supported by a growing evidence base of 2025–2026 meta-analyses and systematic reviews.
Ahnaf Afsin, Rumaysha Tahan Towaa, Kasif Suhail Ayate et al.· Frontiers in Computer Scienc...· 0 citations
It is argued that detection-centred enforcement is a structurally weak control and proposed instead a layered institutional framework in which policy and governance, pedagogy and assessment redesign, and technology-based assurance operate as mutually reinforcing controls, sustained by a continuous audit and improvement cycle.
Dr. G. Purushothaman, Dr. S. Ganapathy, Mr. Saurabh Jaiswal, Mr. Thanga Kumaran M· International Journal of Adv...· 0 citations
The main challenge lies not in AI technology itself, but in how educational institutions manage its use responsibly, and collaboration is needed between educators, students, policy makers and educational institutions in formulating guidelines for the use of AI.
I. J. Dewanto, H. Basri, Zulfitri et al.· International Journal of Sus...· 0 citations