GaitVista, a reliability-aware measurement layer whose lightweight gate assigns joint- and frame-specific visual contributions using camera coverage, local visual quality, cross-modal disagreement, and root-motion continuity, is presented and is the only deployable fusion method to improve over both unimodal streams.
Abstract
Tracking recovery of walking function requires detecting meaningful gait change across rehabilitation sessions, yet objective 3D measurement remains confined to specialized motion-capture laboratories. Small camera sets and body-worn inertial sensors broaden access, but reliability varies across joints and time, allowing sensing failures to masquerade as patient change. We present \textsc{GaitVista}, a reliability-aware measurement layer whose lightweight gate assigns joint- and frame-specific visual contributions using camera coverage, local visual quality, cross-modal disagreement, and root-motion continuity, and exposes them for inspection. Across seven clean and degraded sensing conditions on TotalCapture, \textsc{GaitVista} reduces average full-body and lower-body error by \textbf{27.7\%} and \textbf{27.8\%}, attains the lowest worst-condition error among fusion methods, and reduces the gap to a joint-frame oracle from $2.76$--$5.33$~cm for condition-blind baselines to $1.11$~cm. On MoVi with image-derived keypoints, it is the only deployable fusion method to improve over both unimodal streams, reducing marker-supported error by \textbf{6.4\%} relative to the strongest learned fusion baseline. On TotalCapture, it improves bilateral knee-flexion waveform accuracy by \textbf{18.9\%}. Raw inertial measurements from five TotalCapture participants show location- and time-varying magnetic disturbance, supporting the design's reliability premise. Both benchmarks contain neurologically healthy participants in controlled settings and retain participant-specific IMU calibration; we therefore report progress toward accessible gait assessment, not validated clinical deployment.
The gait parameters, i.e., gait speed, stride length, step length, and cadence, serve as key indicators for patients with mobility impairments. Monitoring these parameters can significantly aid in assessing recovery progress, especially in stroke patients. Compared to traditional clinical visits, wearable sensors, or m...
Zhuang-Zhuang Gu, Ryan Titus, Hem Regmi et al.· Computers in Biology and Med...· 0 citations
Traditional gait analysis systems often suffer from high costs and operational complexity. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a single-view markerless gait analysis method and system for rehabilitation assessment. The system captures sagittal-plane walking videos using a monocular camera and employs Spor...
Ying-Ying Jia, Ai-Hui Wang, Yao Yao et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Background: Traditional 3D gait analysis constrains natural movement variability due to artificial laboratory settings; thus, this study evaluated the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a low-cost, 2D markerless smartphone video protocol for assessing lower limb sagittal kinematics in an unconstrained environment. M...
S. Pérez-de-la-Cruz, F. Molina-Rueda, P. Fernández-González· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
Assessing balance is crucial in neurological rehabilitation, yet while wearable sensors enable real-world monitoring, identifying reliable digital biomarkers remains challenging. This study utilized a high-fidelity instrumented walkway to determine which gait parameters best predict balance impairment, providing robust...
Victor S. You, Leland Barnard, H. Botha et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
Markerless motion capture offers a practical alternative to marker-based optoelectronic systems, yet validation studies have focused almost exclusively on linear gait measures. Nonlinear measures of gait dynamics, sensitive to the fine temporal structure of locomotor signals, remain unvalidated in markerless systems. T...