Skip to content

PINNForge: Execution-Grounded Evolutionary Design of Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 42 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

PINNForge is developed, an execution-grounded large language model (LLM)-driven evolutionary framework that treats observed PINN training behavior as a cross-generation design signal and achieves the lowest mean MSE on 24 tasks among RoPINN, PINNsFormer, PINNsAgent, and PINNForge.

Abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) require coordinated choices across representation, architecture, sampling, constraints, loss construction, and optimization, yet effective configurations can vary substantially across partial differential equations (PDEs). Existing automated design methods search over these choices, but training outcomes are still used primarily to rank candidates rather than to inform subsequent designs. We develop PINNForge, an execution-grounded large language model (LLM)-driven evolutionary framework that treats observed PINN training behavior as a cross-generation design signal. PINNForge initializes diverse configurations from PDE-related prior knowledge, executes them, retains globally strong configurations, and feeds their execution evidence and accumulated run-level experience back to the LLM. The LLM then revises and recombines coupled design components or explores new combinations within a generate--execute--evaluate--evolve loop. Across 25 PDE benchmarks, PINNForge achieves the lowest mean MSE on 24 tasks among RoPINN, PINNsFormer, PINNsAgent, and PINNForge. Removing knowledge guidance, execution feedback, or evolutionary search increases the median task-wise MSE ratio to 3.74$\times$, 12.10$\times$, and 10.10$\times$, respectively, relative to full PINNForge.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

PINNMorph: Evolving Online Adaptation Policies for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a learning-based framework for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their training behavior can change substantially throughout optimization. Residual distributions, gradient interactions, regional learning difficulty, and model-capacity requirements may ev...

Xu Yang, Ming-Yang Yu, Jun Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Inverted model selection in physics-informed neural networks: when a lower residual selects a worse solution

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are commonly evaluated via a single aggregate residual, assuming a smaller residual indicates a better solution. Testing this directly across three constrained PDE systems, I find this assumption can systematically fail. In matched pairs of solvers differing only in whether a de...

R. Musah · 0 citations
Sep 2026

PINNA: Physics‐Informed Neural Networks Architecture for Implicit Governing Physics With Interpretability

PINNA is validated across three fundamentally different benchmarks: two composite‐material problems involving nonlinear stress‐strain behavior and multistage failure, and a large‐scale 1‐D laminar combustion problem governed by stiff chemical kinetics, thermal transport, and reduced fluid mechanics.

Zheng-Tao Yao, Philippe Hawi, V. Aitharaju et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Spatiotemporal Compositional Active Sampling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) approximate partial differential equations (PDEs) by enforcing governing equations and boundary conditions during training, but their accuracy depends on how collocation points are distributed and updated. We propose spatiotemporal compositional active sampling (STCAS), a refere...

Ju-Zheng Zhang, Shi-Yang Li, Tao Zhu et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Gradient Surgery for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are trained by optimising a composite objective that combines data fitting with physics-based constraints, typically resulting in a highly imbalanced multi-task optimisation problem. Under these conditions, existing optimisation strategies are affected by conflicting task gradie...

Thomas Borsani, G. Di Fatta · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Sep 29, 2026

Who we become when we talk to machines

Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.