Skip to content

Atomic Units of X: The Compression Layer of Intelligence

Jul 2026 · 0 citations · 66 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper proposes a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding intelligence as a process of atomic compression and compositional reuse, and develops a representational account of the meaning gap in contemporary generative systems.

Abstract

This paper proposes a theoretical and empirical framework for understanding intelligence as a process of atomic compression and compositional reuse. It argues that scalable cognitive, biological, computational, and organisational systems reduce complexity by organising information into reusable units that can be recombined into higher-order structures. The central contribution is the Compression Calculus, a formal framework for comparing surface evidence with atomic representations and for describing how abstraction can compound across layers. The framework is evaluated on large, multi-source software corpora under an open-world concept model, showing substantial evidence-to-concept consolidation in two large projects, while a smaller third project remains below the target threshold. The analysis further identifies important boundary conditions: consolidation depends on corpus scale, evidence-unit definition, and concept identity, and the observed reduction is driven primarily by within-corpus recurrence rather than cross-source recurrence. The paper also develops a representational account of the meaning gap in contemporary generative systems, describing latent, context-dependent conceptual approximations as soft atoms that lack the persistent identity and compositional constraints of stable atomic units. This motivates an architectural view in which large language models function as dynamic fusion engines that navigate and compose persistent conceptual structures rather than serving as the sole repository of those structures.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Open access Aug 2026

Theoretical Framework for Completeness and Consistency of Knowledge in Generative AI Large Language Models

It is argued that understanding AI knowledge creation is essential for bridging traditional human KM with the emerging discipline of AI Knowledge Management, and for designing governance structures that account for the inherent incompleteness and inconsistency of LLM knowledge.

Thuan Quy Nguyen · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models: Mechanistic Methodology, Empirical Practices, and Applications

This tutorial provides a comprehensive, end-to-end view of LLM interpretability, transitioning from microscopic neural analysis to macroscopic application and deployment, and explores how these interpretability paradigms scale and inspire the design of frontier architectures, agentic systems, and thinking models.

Wei Zhang, Zheng-Fu He, Lu-Lu Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Book Open access Aug 2026

Structure Shapes the Future of DataxLLM Systems: Retrieval, Structuring, and Reasoning

This tutorial presents a unified vision in which structuring serves as the enabling foundation for three pillars of next-generation LLM systems, highlighting how the cooperative interplay between classical KDD techniques and modern LLMs-where KDD defines structural schemas and quality constraints while LLMs execute fle...

Peng-Cheng Jiang, Jiashuo Sun, Wonbin Kweon et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

An Analytical Framework for the Evolution of Large Language Models: From Reasoning to LLM-as-a-Judge

The study concludes that future LLM systems are likely to become more adaptive, verifiable, self-evaluating, and self-correcting, and recommends improving judge reliability, error traceability, and human oversight in high-risk applications, while exploring judge-governed execution as a future extension for agentic and...

Mariam Obeidat · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

On the Diversity of Analogy Making in Large Language Models

This work presents a comprehensive evaluation of analogy diversity across ten state-of-the-art open- and closed-source LLMs, and reveals a fundamental trade-off in existing LLM diversity-enhancement methods: increasing output diversity often comes at the expense of output quality.

Yuanhao Shen, D. X. de Sousa, Caio César Sifuentes Barcelos et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.