PAVER, Planning-Aligned BEV Encoder Pretraining is introduced, where from a single LiDAR sweep, PAVER constructs sparse risk and unknown targets describing occupied and unobserved evidence along rule-based ego motions, preserving the downstream architecture and camera-only inference.
Abstract
End-to-end driving requires planning-relevant bird's-eye-view (BEV) representations, but existing pretraining approaches often rely on task annotations or dense scene reconstruction. We introduce PAVER, Planning-Aligned BEV Encoder Pretraining. From a single LiDAR sweep, PAVER constructs sparse risk and unknown targets describing occupied and unobserved evidence along rule-based ego motions. A 10K-parameter head predicts these targets from masked BEV features conditioned on the action state, directing supervision toward geometric constraints on candidate motions. Pretraining requires no driving-task annotations or dense reconstruction. Only the BEV encoder is transferred, preserving the downstream architecture and camera-only inference. On nuScenes, PAVER reduces VAD-Tiny's average collision rate from 0.51% to 0.19%, while improving planning L2, motion prediction, detection, and mapping. The selected VAD-Tiny and VAD-Base schedules use about 36% less estimated total training time than scratch training, including pretraining. On Bench2Drive Town05 Long, PAVER improves UniAD-Tiny's closed-loop Driving Score from 48.45 to 58.79. The project page is available at https://archiiive99.github.io/PAVER.
We present S2Planner, a trajectory planner that combines three front-facing cameras with ego-motion history and the current driving command. A fine-tuned DINOv3 backbone and a Spatial Tuning Adapter produce multi-scale image features; a coarse-to-fine decoder then uses trajectory self-attention and camera-projected cro...
Zhao-Wei Lu, Li-Guo Zhou, Yu-Jie Guo et al.· 0 citations
World models (WMs) have demonstrated strong potential for end-to-end autonomous driving by learning predictive representations of future scene dynamics. However, generating future videos during inference introduces substantial computational overhead, leading many recent driving WMs to adopt a single front camera as inp...
Jin-Yang Wang, Shi-Wei Li, Jun-Jian Wang et al.· 0 citations
Humanoid robots can step over, squeeze past, and duck under obstacles, but learning to select and coordinate these behaviors from onboard perception remains challenging. Many existing approaches rely on task-specific reinforcement-learning objectives or curated motion libraries, making broad behavioral coverage costly....
Yuxuan Ma, Zi-Cheng Zeng, Chun-Li Peng et al.· 1 citation
Autonomous driving requires more than recognizing what is present in a scene: a planner must determine how road structure, surrounding agents, and their motion states should influence a future maneuver. Existing learning-based planners can capture these influences through latent scene features and trajectory decoders,...
Zhi-Yuan Liu, Yuan-Xin Tian, Ze-Hong Ke et al.· 0 citations
SimWAM, a simple yet effective WAM that leverages future-video prediction as a training-time supervision signal, co-trains a pretrained video expert and a lightweight action expert with joint flow matching and applies reinforcement learning to optimize a compositional driving reward beyond trajectory imitation.
Zongchuang Zhao, Xin Zhou, Tianyang Xu et al.· 4 citations
Driving policies require capabilities of scene understanding and future evolution prediction. To achieve this goal, current end-to-end models typically construct complex perception-planning pipelines or introduce world models that explicitly predict future states, resulting in a complex system architecture. Inspired by...
Yue-Ting Zhu, Shao-Yu Chen, Yue-Hao Song et al.· 0 citations
Known for his clear and elegant writing style, Bertsekas shaped fields from control and optimization to large-scale computation and artificial intelligence.