GAOKAO-Bench is introduced, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions that contribute a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
Abstract
Large Language Models(LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across various natural language processing tasks; however, how to comprehensively and accurately assess their performance becomes an urgent issue to be addressed. This paper introduces GAOKAO-Bench, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples, including both subjective and objective questions. To align with human examination methods, we design a method based on zero-shot settings to evaluate the performance of LLMs. With human evaluation, we obtain the converted total score of LLMs, including GPT-4, ChatGPT and ERNIE-Bot.Our findings reveal that LLMs have achieved competitive scores in Chinese GAOKAO examination, while they exhibit significant performance disparities across various subjects. We also use LLMs to grade the subjective questions, and find that model scores achieve a moderate level of consistency with human scores. In conclusion, this research contributes a robust evaluation benchmark for future large language models and offers valuable insights into the advantages and limitations of such models.
A fundamental gap between generation fluency and reasoning ability is uncovered, a pronounced ''inverse scaling effect'' where larger models can underperform in domain-specific reasoning, and systemic bottlenecks across all SOTA models are identified, exposing fundamental limitations of current architectures.
Guangtao Nie, Huimu Wang, Gewei Lu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
CALAMITA is conceived as a rolling benchmark, enabling continuous integration of new tasks and models, and argues that this combination offers a blueprint for other languages and communities seeking inclusive and rigorous LLM evaluation practices.
Malvina Nissim, Danilo Croce, V. Patti et al.· Italian Journal of Computati...· 0 citations
LigBench is proposed, an automated evaluation benchmark that enables fine-grained and reliable evaluation of AI research ideas, consistently applicable across different generation distributions, and PAIR-IQ, a dataset tailored for training pairwise idea judgment models and serving as an auxiliary reference to support m...
Chen-Run Wang, Mingxuan Zhu, Tian-Cheng Huang et al.· 1 citation
No overall preference is indicated between human and machine-generated summaries; however, experts with greater familiarity with the Bulletin and higher educational attainment showed a marked preference for the official summaries.
Claudia Biancotti, C. Camassa, Marco Fruzzetti et al.· 0 citations
This work systematically map 14,767 papers introducing or updating evaluation resources from arXiv submissions between January 2022 and August 2026, using staged screening and automated full-text coding to examine changes in target systems and domains, evaluation materials and conditions, and scoring mechanisms.
A statistical framework for quantitatively assessing LLM reliability under multiple evaluation criteria and shows that the proposed framework can identify reliability differences between different LLMs is reasonably robust to variations in indicator weights.
Yi Zhu· Advances in Engineering Inno...· 0 citations