Aug 2025· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2508.11017· 5 citations· 48 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work introduces a controlled setting to study the causes and training dynamics of cross-lingual knowledge transfer by training small Transformer models from scratch on synthetic multilingual datasets and suggests methods to encourage representational unification as part of training that would improve LLMs'cross-lingual transfer.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) struggle with cross-lingual knowledge transfer: they sometimes hallucinate when asked in one language about facts expressed in a different language during training. This work introduces a controlled setting to study the causes and training dynamics of this phenomenon by training small Transformer models from scratch on synthetic multilingual datasets. Depending on (1) the correlation between facts and the language they were learned in (informativeness), and (2) the ease of language identification (extractability), models either develop unified representations across languages or separate representations; only when representations are unified do facts transfer across languages. Based on these insights, we propose a unifying perspective which explains a range of prior observations concerning cross-lingual transfer in multilingual LLMs. Our work shows controlled settings can shed light on pre-training dynamics and suggests methods to encourage representational unification as part of training that would improve LLMs'cross-lingual transfer.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in the processing and modeling of many languages. Yet, unlike human multilinguals, they exhibit surprisingly limited cross-lingual knowledge transfer. While this limitation is well documented, its origins during multilingual training remain unclear. We pretrain...
Adam Gaber, Uriel Dolev, Elisabeth Fittschen et al.· 0 citations
The results show that fact transfer is very limited: under the strictest removal condition, a large majority of English-acquired facts fail to transfer into Persian, and it is shown that sentence-level co-occurrence removal is insufficient to eliminate fact signal.
Romina Oji, Marc Braun, Marcel Bollmann et al.· 0 citations
Centroid Intervention Fusion is proposed, a projection fusion framework that consolidates multiple multilingual intervention projections into a single language-shared operator and outperforms the strongest prior pairwise intervention baseline by up to +3.3% across four model backbones.
CLLPU (Cross-Lingual and Language-Bound Protocol for LLM Unlearning), a multilingual benchmark that formulates this problem through two settings: common-goal forgetting, where target knowledge should be suppressed across all languages, and language-conditioned forgetting, where suppression should remain confined to a d...
Pengyang Shao, Chuan-Peng Lu, Wei Qin et al.· 1 citation
These results indicate that for multilingual models spanning typologically diverse scripts, to obtain maximum benefits, romanization should be treated as a core design choice applied at pretraining rather than a post hoc fix.
Mu-Ge Zhang, Aaron Jencks, Krishna Badikela et al.· 0 citations
Three lines of evidence are shown that provide convergent evidence in support of the interlingua hypothesis, which holds that language models translate by reading a source sentence into a latent feature space, and generate a target sentence by reading from the latent feature space.
Jacob Brinton, Jannik Brinkmann, Mark Crovella et al.· 0 citations