Evaluated on two reasoning domains, math and multi-hop reasoning, across 1-8B models from different families, LoT consistently improves over KD and converges faster than staged curricula, highlighting the value of adaptive progression.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) excel at reasoning when scaled to hundreds of billions of parameters, but small- and mid-scale models remain brittle reasoners even with knowledge distillation (KD). We present Ladders-of-Thought (LoT), a framework that improves reasoning by combining progressive question rewrites with a self-evolving curriculum. LoT automatically generates semantically faithful but easier variants of reasoning problems, organizes them into difficulty buckets using step-based measures, and employs a self-evolving bandit scheduler to allocate training adaptively. Evaluated on two reasoning domains, math and multi-hop reasoning, across 1-8B models from different families, LoT consistently improves over KD. It delivers large gains on arithmetic tasks (e.g., +32 percentage points on AddSub, +25pp on SVAMP), +2-8pp improvements on in-domain test splits, and strong though dataset-dependent benefits on multi-hop reasoning (e.g., +16pp on QASC, +25pp on StrategyQA). LoT also converges faster than staged curricula, highlighting the value of adaptive progression. These results show that progressive rewrites coupled with adaptive curricula provide a simple yet effective recipe for strengthening reasoning in smaller LLMs.
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting can substantially improve the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs), but it often comes with high inference cost due to long and poorly controlled reasoning traces. This overhead is particularly problematic in software engineering tasks (e.g., code generation), where both la...
Ke-Rui Huang, Shu-Han Liu, Xing Hu et al.· Proceedings of the ACM on So...· 0 citations
This work proposes ChainPrune, a novel reasoning path semantic structural optimization method to efficiently and controllably synthesize self-generated high-quality training data and incorporates a DPO-based preference learning method combined with supervised loss, effectively mitigating false reward suppression.
Wei-Hang Pan, Zhengxu Yu, Yuxiang Zhang et al.· 2 citations
ThinkRetrieve is proposed, a test-time scaling framework that augments the reasoning traces of LRMs with dynamically retrieved solved examples at each reasoning step, providing the model with guidance on how to reason rather than merely what facts are relevant.
Self-Play Search Distillation (SPSD), a framework for generating superhuman synthetic data via self-play of MuZero-like networks trained on board games, offers an annotation-efficient way to create high-quality synthetic data for improving LLM performance in reasoning tasks.
Lorenzo Molfetta, Wai-Chung Kwan, Giacomo Frisoni et al.· 0 citations
State of Thought is proposed, a new reasoning paradigm that enables endogenous reasoning in LLMs, with the model's internal reasoning state governing how reasoning unfolds, and provides a generalizable and efficient alternative to existing test-time reasoning paradigms.
Z. Gong, Yi-Kun Hou, Zi-Hao Zeng et al.· 0 citations
The results show that different thinking mechanisms can learn distinct computational solutions, even at similar ID performance, and in this setting, latent recurrence supports a reusable forward-search algorithm that generalizes beyond the training depth.
Assistant Professor Benjamin Lindquist studies how engineers deliberately injected randomness into early AI, giving rise to deep-learning models that sometimes hallucinate.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.