The results show that improving IF in LRMs can significantly enhance privacy, suggesting a promising direction for future privacy-aware LRMs, and introduces an SFT dataset that teaches models to follow general instructions throughout their reasoning process.
Abstract
Large reasoning models (LRMs) produce reasoning traces (RTs) that often contain sensitive information. These leaky thoughts are difficult to control and frequently violate explicit privacy directives. Because RTs can be exposed through prompt injection attacks, this becomes a direct privacy risk to the user. We approach this as a controllability problem: since privacy directives are themselves instructions, improving instruction-following (IF) within the RT provides a direct path to reducing privacy leaks. To this end, we introduce an SFT dataset that teaches models to follow general instructions throughout their reasoning process, and propose Staged Decoding, a simple decoding strategy that decouples RT and answer generation using separate LoRA adapters to maximize IF of each component. We evaluate our approach on six models from two families (1.7B-14B parameters), across two IF benchmarks and two privacy benchmarks. Our method yields substantial improvements, with gains of up to 20.9 points in IF and 51.9 percentage points on privacy benchmarks, though these can come at the cost of task utility due to the trade-off between reasoning performance and IF. Our results show that improving IF in LRMs can significantly enhance privacy, suggesting a promising direction for future privacy-aware LRMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/UKPLab/arxiv2026-controllable-reasoning-models.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves large language models by grounding them in external evidence, but this exposes them to knowledge-poisoning attacks, where misinformation injected into retrieved documents influences model outputs. We investigate whether deliberative reasoning reduces susceptibility to poiso...
Mehrdad Ghassabi, Audrina Ebrahimi, Sadra Hakim et al.· 0 citations
Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning traces are increasingly proposed as a mechanism for AI oversight: a monitor inspecting a model's reasoning can, in principle, detect misbehavior invisible from outputs alone. This assumes CoT surfaces what a model is instructed to do regardless of the instructions given. We test this as...
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) is deployed to make models better at reasoning tasks, but its side effect on what models will divulge is under studied. Here we show that RLVR on facts increases extraction of personally identifiable information (PII) the instruct model had already memorized. We fir...
This work proposes a refined security principle: only agents capable of deliberative System 2 reasoning may access untrusted documents, and empirically compares state-of-the-art reasoning language models with standard language models to show that reasoning-capable models are substantially more robust to corrupted evide...
Leakage enables two practical attacks: a trained classifier that infers semantic predicates about user memories from routine natural-language outputs, and an RL-trained adversary that extracts full Social Security Numbers from a production-style agent.
Jaiden Fairoze, Neal Mangaokar, Kamalika Chaudhuri et al.· 0 citations