Results show that persistent program growth can move recurring control out of model context and into low-cost code, yielding reusable specialist agents that remain effective with smaller deployment models.
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents often handle streams of related tasks, yet standard harnesses repeatedly ask the model to reconstruct the same control decisions inside each task's context. We study whether task feedback can instead turn recurring control into reusable executable code, while reserving LLM calls for task-specific semantic reasoning. We introduce Growing Harness, a failure-guided training paradigm that learns the agent harness itself from a strategy-free scaffold that exposes fixed model and tool interfaces but encodes no task-solving controller. Function-level execution traces localize each failure to a bounded code surface, an optimizer repairs a window of failures jointly, and a success-first held-out gate rolls back repair sequences that harm prior capability. Accepted edits accumulate in one shared harness, allowing its control structure to emerge from task feedback. Across BrowseComp-Plus and WebArena-Verified with three deployment models from 4B to 120B parameters, Growing Harness achieves the highest mean success in five of six benchmark-model settings and trails the best mean by 0.7 pp. in the sixth. Relative to a Tool-Calling agent, it reduces LLM calls by 76.0-91.8% and deployed-agent inference cost by 74.4-98.6%. On WebArena-Verified, its success remains 44.7-45.3% across model scales, whereas Tool-Calling falls to 6.7% with the 4B model. Ablations show that trace-local edits, joint repair, and gate-based rollback each improve final success. These results show that persistent program growth can move recurring control out of model context and into low-cost code, yielding reusable specialist agents that remain effective with smaller deployment models.
A reinforcement learning framework that jointly trains tool creation and tool use inside a single policy, with three separate reward axes that catch schema, code, and outcome failures independently, so each failure mode contributes its own gradient.
Zhi Rui Tam, Chieh-Yen Lin, Yun-Nung Chen et al.· 2 citations
This formulation enables a systematic study of key self-improvement factors through the proposed Evo-Harness, and provides a principled understanding of how LLM agents can effectively learn on the fly.
Tian-Xin Wei, Zhan Shi, Min-hua Lin et al.· 14 citations
This work studies a lightweight coding harness whose execution loop is fixed while three components are varied: planning, action space, and context management, and finds that context management becomes increasingly valuable as the context-window budget tightens.
Run-Ze Fan, Zihao Zhang, Si-Min Ma et al.· 14 citations· ⚡2
Agent harnesses govern how large language models (LLMs) gather context, invoke tools, verify results, preserve state, and terminate, largely affecting agent performance. However, the value of each harness mechanism can differ across heterogeneous tasks: a mechanism that improves one task may impose overhead or context...
Peng Kuang, Hai-Bo Jin, De-Hao Wu et al.· 0 citations
Language agents rely on external harnesses to track state, organize workflows, and verify answers. Beyond providing tools and information, these harnesses supply control decisions about what to investigate, whether to revise, and when to stop. Training on successful harness-supported trajectories can improve task perfo...
To the authors' knowledge, JIT-Agent is the first model purpose-built for just-in-time harness generation, establishing harness intelligence as a trainable, transferable, and compounding dimension of agent capability orthogonal to model scaling.
Gui-Bin Zhang, Leo Lu, Fang-Zhou Xie et al.· 14 citations