The Variational JEPA (Var-JEPA), which makes the latent generative structure explicit by optimizing a single Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) and yields meaningful representations without ad-hoc anti-collapse regularizers and allows principled uncertainty quantification in the latent space.
Abstract
The Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) is often seen as a non-generative alternative to likelihood-based self-supervised learning, emphasizing prediction in representation space rather than reconstruction in observation space. We argue that the resulting separation from probabilistic generative modeling is largely rhetorical rather than structural: the canonical JEPA design (coupled encoders with a context-to-target predictor) mirrors the variational posteriors and learned conditional priors obtained when variational inference is applied to a particular class of coupled latent-variable models, and standard JEPA can be viewed as a deterministic specialization in which regularization is imposed via architectural and training heuristics rather than an explicit likelihood. Building on this view, we derive the Variational JEPA (Var-JEPA), which makes the latent generative structure explicit by optimizing a single Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO). This yields meaningful representations without ad-hoc anti-collapse regularizers and allows principled uncertainty quantification in the latent space. We instantiate the framework for tabular data (Var-T-JEPA) and achieve strong representation learning and downstream performance, improving over T-JEPA across real-world tabular benchmarks while remaining competitive with strong raw-feature baselines.
Self-supervised visual representation learning learns useful features without manual annotations during representation training. The image-based joint-embedding predictive architecture (I-JEPA) predicts latent representations of masked image regions, but its objective does not explicitly model responses to specified vi...
Variational autoencoders (VAEs) offer an efficient approach to amortized Bayesian inference for inverse problems, but posterior accuracy can depend strongly on the choice of variational regularization, particularly when the inverse problem contains weakly identified parameter directions. This study investigates three o...
We interpret Transformer networks as learned approximations to a hybrid probabilistic-inference procedure that combines max-product Loopy Belief Propagation (LBP) with Expectation--Maximization (EM). In this view, a Transformer performs inference in partially observed Markov Random Fields (MRFs) whose structure and par...
Neural simulation-based inference (SBI) has been widely successful in inferring a relatively small number of interpretable parameters from potentially high-dimensional observations, such as images or time series. Accordingly, representation learning in SBI has focused almost exclusively on compressing the observations...
Lars Kuhmichel, Stefan T. Radev, B. Koppolu et al.· 0 citations
Conditional neural fields represent signals continuously, but their effectiveness depends on how the conditional latent representations are inferred from observed data. In meta-learning, this encoding occurs through gradient updates induced by the decoder, tying representation learning directly to decoder design. We fo...
R. L. M. van Herten, Soufiane Ben Haddou, Rachit Saluja et al.· 0 citations
Representation alignment with pretrained visual encoders improves diffusion transformer training but requires auxiliary encoders and extra training overhead. Recent approaches instead exploit representations from the generative model's own variational autoencoder (VAE). However, reconstruction-oriented VAE features are...
Zhao-Wei Chen, Yi-Kai Ge, Lin-Ze Li et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.