This work introduces ED-CSP, a machine learning framework that predicts crystal structures from chemical composition, atom count, and multiple detector-plane ED spot sets and establishes a benchmark for generative crystal structure prediction from sparse ED observations and provides a foundation for future transfer to experimental data.
Abstract
Recovering a periodic 3D crystal structure from sparse, unindexed electron diffraction (ED) observations is a challenging generative inverse problem. Existing ED-based learning methods mainly predict crystallographic labels, reconstruct structures from indexed reflections, or retrieve candidates from finite structure libraries. Here, we introduce ED-CSP, a machine learning framework that predicts crystal structures from chemical composition, atom count, and multiple detector-plane ED spot sets. ED-CSP combines a relational set encoder, permutation-invariant multi-view aggregation, and a periodic flow generator to jointly predict lattice parameters and fractional atomic coordinates. To train the model, we construct ED-CS, a dataset of 4.85 million simulated multi-view ED crystal structures, deduplicated across seven materials repositories and filtered to exclude CHILI-100K overlaps. On 2,075 held-out CHILI-100K materials, ED-CSP trained only on CHILI achieves a structural match rate of 57.49% MR@5, outperforming PXRDGen (52.92%), a state-of-the-art crystal structure prediction model conditioned on powder X-ray diffraction. Scaling training data further improves performance: initializing from a one-million-structure precursor raises MR@5 to 66.27%. On 1,024 compositions absent from the training retrieval library, the model still achieves 53.52% MR@5, demonstrating true generative capability beyond exact-formula retrieval. Replacing target ED observations with diffraction from non-isomorphic structures of identical composition decreases MR@5 by 22.09 percentage points, confirming that predictions depend on the input diffraction patterns rather than composition alone. ED-CSP and ED-CS establish a benchmark for generative crystal structure prediction from sparse ED observations and provide a foundation for future transfer to experimental data.
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) from powder diffraction data is a central challenge in materials chemistry. Machine learning (ML) models show promise, but most are trained on idealized simulated data, limiting reliability on real experiments. Here, we assess real-world behaviour using the previously published deCIFe...
Frederik L. Johansen, A. Sapnik, Erik B. Dam et al.· Digital Discovery· 0 citations
Packora is presented, a flow-based generative model for molecular CSP that jointly predicts atomic coordinates and the lattice from molecular graphs that outperforms the baselines on both structure generation and ranking benchmarks.
Nayoung Kim, Kiyoung Seong, Sungsoo Ahn· 0 citations
A deep-learning-enabled dual-mode CSP framework that simultaneously supports two complementary tasks: predicting stable crystal structures for given elemental compositions and identifying chemically viable elemental substitutions for a predefined crystal topology is proposed.
Chen Qin, Xiang-Yan Luo, Zhi-Xiang Fan et al.· Inorganic Chemistry· 0 citations
Predicting macroscopic properties of crystalline materials from atomic structure remains a central challenge in computational materials science. We introduce Pformer, a modular crystal representation framework built around a Fourier-inspired source encoder. The source model is trained by supervised scalar-property regr...
Crystal Structure Prediction (CSP), the task of determining stable atomic arrangements from chemical composition alone, remains a central challenge in computational materials science with direct implications for accelerating materials discovery. While recent diffusion-based generative models achieve impressive results...
Lu Yang, Tian-Tian Xu, Xiu-Feng Liu et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Crystal structure prediction (CSP) is fundamental to computational materials discovery. Generative models including CDVAE, DiffCSP, FlowMM, and CrystalFlow learn stable-crystal distributions directly, but diffusion and flow-matching inference requires tens to thousands of sequential network evaluations per candidate. W...
Sourin Dey, Dipannoy Das Gupta, Wei Lai et al.· 0 citations
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduOct 13, 2026
Machine-learning networks can learn without detailed instructions from a designer. Those that do may offer insight into how the brain reorganizes itself during learning.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 29, 2026
Professor Sherry Turkle’s new book, “Artificial Intimacy,” offers a withering critique of chatbots and the antisocial dynamics she believes they encourage.