Skip to content

Not All Objectives Are Born Equal: Priority-Constrained Descent for Hierarchical Multi-Objective Optimization

Jun 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2606.29521 · 0 citations · 40 references
Computer Science Mathematics

Abstract

Deep learning problems rarely involve objectives that are equal in importance. A primary objective defines the goal, whilst secondary objectives, such as sparsity, compression, or robustness constrain the solution. While existing multi-objective methods have proven effective in practice, they have a clear symmetry problem and neglect the inherent objective hierarchy built into these objective spaces. We introduce Priority-Constrained Descent (PCD), a gradient-based optimization framework designed to explicitly exploit hierarchical objective structures. PCD preserves the direction of primary descent whilst allowing for the minimal distortion necessary to guarantee progress on secondary objectives, controlled by a single $\tau \in [0, 1]$ that dictates the strength of the distortion. The resulting formulation is invariant to objective scaling and admits exact closed-form solutions for problems with two and three objectives. We evaluate PCD within structured network compression settings, unstructured sparsity and low-rankness, and across a variety of synthetic experiments, showing Pareto dominance and better per-objective performance with secondary progress guarantees over existing methods, further exhibiting the interpretable trade-off that $\tau$ provides.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

Learning Where to Steer: Noise-Space Geometry for Efficient Offline Multi-Objective Optimization with Generative Models

Offline multi-objective optimization (MOO) seeks solutions with better objective trade-offs using only a fixed dataset, without querying the objectives. Diffusion models trained on such data have emerged as a promising approach, but their samples are not inherently better than the data and must be steered toward the Pa...

Yuan-Tong Lu, Esha Singh, Yi-An Ma et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Oct 2026

Geometry-Aware Multi-Objective Optimization: Norm-Constrained Oracles with Entropic Weight Updates

Multiple-gradient descent is typically formulated in Euclidean geometry, whereas matrix-aware optimizers use directions induced by other norms. We analyze a single-loop multi-objective method combining a norm-constrained linear minimization oracle with entropic updates of task weights. For any finite-dimensional norm p...

El Mahdi Chayti, Alireza Mirrokni, Martin Jaggi · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Oct 2026

SoftServe: A Scalable Quasi-Newton Method for Deep Learning

SoftServe, a family of QN methods designed to overcome non-convexity and enormous parameter sizes, is introduced, and derives positivedefinite curvature estimates from the variational objective of Berglund et al. (2025), even in the presence of negative curvature.

Joohwan Ko, Tetiana Parshakova, Diana Cai et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Stochastic Frank–Wolfe methods for stochastic multi-objective optimization

The Stochastic Frank–Wolfe (SFW) algorithm is proposed, a projection-free framework that leverages linear minimization oracles to bypass expensive projection operations and achieves rigorous convergence rate guarantees for both convex and non-convex objectives.

Yong Zhao, Yue-Lei Zhu, Wang Chen et al. · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

dOPT: Differentiating Conic Optimization via Geometric Reduction

Optimization layers enable the incorporation of structured constraints and decision problems into learning systems. Training such systems requires differentiating through the embedded optimization problem, which can be challenging for general conic programs. We introduce dOPT, a solver-agnostic framework that, rather t...

Feng-Yu Yang, Connor W. Magoon, Tyler Watts et al. · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

A Better Spur Should Start From Each Objective

This work proposes Multi-Marginal Preference Optimization (MMPO), a fine-grained framework that intervenes at the data, gradient, and constraint levels rather than relying on coarse-grained global scalarization to address optimization conflicts among multiple objectives in real-world deployment scenarios.

Shang-Wen Mao, Hao Zhang, Guang-Tao Nie et al. · 1 citation · ⚡1

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.