Skip to content

AI Models Can Predict and Collaboratively Modulate Human Memory Search

Jul 2026 · 0 citations
Computer Science

TL;DR

This study explores and evaluates the ability of LLMs to follow and enhance human mental trajectories during semantic memory search and demonstrates that an LLM's abilities to track and predict human memory trajectories in this task exceed those of other humans.

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit unprecedented natural language generation and many text-based problem-solving capabilities. Indeed, in many language-based tasks, for example routine coding, these artificial intelligence models have reduced, or even eliminated, the need for human input. But rather than replacing human cognitive effort, LLMs may instead serve as cognitive tools to extend human abilities, particularly when they are engaged in a task requiring open-ended conceptual exploration and creative ideation. However, we are yet to understand how these models may enhance such generative human cognitive abilities in human--AI interactions. In this study, we explore and evaluate the ability of LLMs to follow and enhance human mental trajectories during semantic memory search. To test this, we use the semantic fluency task (SFT), a classic cognitive paradigm requiring generative semantic memory retrieval that has long served to characterize convergent and divergent thinking in humans. We demonstrate that an LLM's abilities to track and predict human memory trajectories in this task exceed those of other humans.

View source

Similar papers

Jul 2026

Cognitive Convergence: Deep Similarities Between Large Language Models and Human Cognition

LLMs are widely regarded as alien intelligences, systems whose cognitive operations are fundamentally unlike our own. Apparent similarities to human cognition are therefore often seen as the result of anthropomorphic projection. We argue that this framing is mistaken. LLMs clearly differ from humans in important respec...

C. Sripada, Richard L. Lewis · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Assessing mentalization in humans and large language models

Different capacities for mentalization across LLMs are demonstrated, and cognitive computational modeling is highlighted as a formal method for assessing comparative intelligence across humans and machines.

Aamir Sohail, Xintong Zhong, Arkady Konovalov et al. · 0 citations

Are LLMs tools to understand human neurocognition during abstract reasoning?

It is proposed that the best-performing LLMs can be used as models to understand human performance, response times, and the timing of Event-Related Potentials (ERPs) as recorded by electroencephalography (EEG) during the task.

Christopher Pinier, Claire E. Stevenson, Michael D. Nunez · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Human-Centered AI and Cognitive Adaptation: An Empirical Study of Human Responses to AIMediated Information Systems

Artificial intelligence now shapes much of how information reaches people, who read it, and what they make of it. The environments it creates are probabilistic, often fluent without being grounded, and curated by systems whose workings stay hidden. Most research on this shift has gone to AI literacy, explainability, an...

C. Andoniou · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence and Psycholinguistics: How Do Large Language Models Represent Human Language Processes? A Systematic Review

Current research examining the similarities and differences between human language processing and LLM-based language representation indicates that LLMs successfully approximate numerous observable characteristics of human language behavior, including syntactic processing, contextual prediction, semantic association, di...

Astuty Astuty · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Unifying the structures of language in a neural population code

It is concluded that explaining how language can emerge from neural population codes, in both biological and artificial systems, will not be achieved through the incremental refinement of algebraic-symbolic theories but will demand new theoretical paradigms.

Samuel A. Nastase, Zaid Zada, A. Goldberg et al. · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.